##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

This paper reports some activities of a pilot project that aimed to identify then to assess initial contributions made by selected American companies conducting business in Poland at various times since the collapse of Communism in 1991. It chronicles surveys undertaken by the author’s graduate students that included administration of questionnaires with personal interviews of company managers, obstacles encountered, efforts to overcome obstacles, implications for future research, plus preliminary projections of strategies United States government officials need to adopt to maintain repatriation of corporate profits. This research raises questions whether American FDI should be presumed to be good for either America or host countries such as Poland, as well as the extent to which the American taxpayer should tolerate sequestration of assets abroad by giant Fortune-ranked corporations that were chartered in the United States. Questions arise also concerning the propriety if not the legality of large accounting and international law firms assisting and encouraging American corporations in such efforts to hide assets abroad.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. H. Gural. 2017. “Offshore Corporate Tax Loopholes,” Americans for Tax Fairness. https://americansfortaxfairness.org/files/9-ATF-Offshore-Corporate-Tax-Loopholes-fact-sheet.pdf See also, L. Summers. 2017. “One last time on whom corporate tax cuts benefit,” Financial Times. 02 Nov. https://www.ft.com/content/5a362cb6-c2af-3138-bf5d-f1c92b695378
     Google Scholar
  2. “The Growth Effects of Corporate Tax Reform and Implications for Wages.” Washington, D.C.: October 2017, U.S. Council of Economic Advisers. https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/whitehouse.gov/files/images/Corporate%20Tax%20Reform%20and%20Growth%20Final.pdf
     Google Scholar
  3. K.P. Erb. 2018. “Apple Says It Will Bring Cash Back To US, Pay $38 Billion In Repatriation Tax,” Forbes. 17 Jan.https://www.forbes.com/sites/kellyphillipserb/2018/01/17/apple-says-it-will-bring-cash-back-to-us-pay-38-billion-in-repatriation-tax/#c1f70b922226 See also, M. Feldstein. 2017. “The International Consequences of US Tax Reform,” Project-Syndicate.org. 27 Sep. https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/united-states-tax-reform-international-impact-by-martin-feldstein-2017-09?barrier=accessreg
     Google Scholar
  4. W.C. Kim & R. Mauborgne. 2017. Blue Ocean Shift: Beyond Competing: Proven Steps to Inspire Confidence and Seize New Growth. London: Macmillan Hachette Books. See also, Ibid. 2017. Blue Ocean Leadership. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.
     Google Scholar
  5. W.C. Kim & R. Mauborgne. 2017. Red Ocean Traps. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Review Press. See also, I. Lainos. 2011. Red Ocean vs. Blue Ocean Strategies. Athens: University of Piraeus Press, 68-77.
     Google Scholar
  6. Henry, James S. 2012. “The Price of Offshore Revisited: New Estimates for ‘Missing’ Global Private Wealth, Income, Inequality, and Lost Taxes,” Tax Justice Network.http://www.taxjustice.net/cms/upload/pdf/Price_of_Offshore_Revisited_120722.pdf
     Google Scholar
  7. Walker, Dinah. 2015. “Quarterly Update: Foreign Ownership of U.S. Assets,” Federal Reserve Bureau of Economic Analysis & Greenberg Center for Geoeconomic Studies through Council on Foreign Relations. 21 Jan. https://www.cfr.org/report/quarterly-update-foreign-ownership-us-assets
     Google Scholar
  8. “Where Top US Banks Are Betting On Fintech,” CBInsights Research Briefs. 01 February 2018.
     Google Scholar
  9. https://www.cbinsights.com/research/fintec- investments-top-us banks/?utm_source=CB+Insights+Newsletter&utm_campaign=aa617392f7-Top_Research_Briefs_02_10_2018&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_9dc0513989-aa617392f7-90121066
     Google Scholar
  10. D. John, et al. 2008. “Wal-Mart’s ‘Think Global, Act Local’: Can ‘Americanisation’ Have Its Way”,” IBS Research Center (Ref. No. 308-215-1).
     Google Scholar
  11. Tax Justice Network. 2018. “Financial Secrecy Index: 2018 Results,” taxjustice.net.
     Google Scholar
  12. https://financialsecrecyindex.com/introduction/fsi-2018-results Also
     Google Scholar
  13. R.J. Guttman & J. Kozenkow. 2012. “Poland: A Profitable Place to Invest,” TransAtlantic Magazine. 03 Oct. http://transatlantic-magazine.com/poland-a-profitable-place-to-invest/
     Google Scholar
  14. Santander. 2018. “Poland: Foreign Investment.” Santander Trade Portal. https://en.portal.santandertrade.com/establish-overseas/poland/foreign-investment
     Google Scholar
  15. M. van Blommestein. 2012. “Is Poland the Best Place to Start Your Start-up?” Central European Processing. 16 Nov.
     Google Scholar
  16. http://www.zdnet.com/article/is-poland-the-best-place-to-start-your-start-up/
     Google Scholar
  17. S.B. Guia. 2017. “Poland and Eastern Europe heating up as technology hotspots,” The Sociable. 27 Sep.
     Google Scholar
  18. https://sociable.co/technology/eastern-europe-heatingup-tech-hotspot//
     Google Scholar
  19. “Campus Warsaw: Google’s Space for Entrepreneurs,” Google Space.
     Google Scholar
  20. https://www.campus.co/warsaw/en/about/
     Google Scholar
  21. “Samsung Incubator: Helping Digitize Poland by Supporting Start-ups,” Samsung Newsroom. 28 April 2017.
     Google Scholar
  22. https://news.samsung.com/global/samsung-incubator-helping-digitize-poland-by-supporting-start-ups.
     Google Scholar
  23. American Chamber of Commerce in Poland, Board of Directors. http://amcham.pl/about-us/board-of-directors
     Google Scholar