Review Article

Challenges of Milton Friedman’s Contributions: A Perspective of Behavioral Economics

Di Zhu
Saint Mary's University of Minnesota, USA
* Corresponding author
DOI icon 10.24018/ejbmr.2021.6.5.1053

Read Counter
1146

Downloads
819

Citations

Share

Article Sidebar

Submitted 2021-08-12
Published 2021-09-03

Read counter = 1146 times

Table of Contents

Article Main Content

This paper reviewed Milton Friedman's major contributions and critiqued his theories from a perspective of behavioral economics. Overall, behavioral economics can be a significant supplement to the traditional Friedman's theories to better predict economic events. More specifically, in terms of money supply, behavioral economics found that emotions can distort the assumption of the quantity theory of money and it may also affect economic output through its big role in decision making. As for the permanent income hypothesis, it can better explain the effect of income on consumption from the psychological aspect such as low confidence. His major point of a free market for economic and political freedom can be challenged by Nudge concept from behavioral economics. The government can help people to achieve their goals without damaging their autonomy. In addition, behavioral economics explores more and better reasons for the common phenomena of irrational behaviors against the traditional assumption that people are always rational.

Keywords: Behavioral Economics, Capitalism and Freedom, Irrational Behaviors, Milton Friedman, Money Supply, Permanent Income Hypothesis

References

  1. Skole, R. (1977). En-Nobeling Milton Friedman. Nation, 224(3), 68.
     Google Scholar
  2. Gurley, J. G. (1957). Studies in the quantity theory of money. The American Economic Review, 47(5), 732.
     Google Scholar
  3. Weintraub, S., & Habibagahi, H. (1972). Money Supplies and Price–Output Indeterminateness: The Friedman Puzzle. Journal of Economic Issues, 6(2-3), 1-13.
     Google Scholar
  4. Maccarrone‐Eaglen, A., & Schofield, P. (2017). Compulsive buying behavior: Re‐evaluating its dimensions and screening. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 16(5), 463-473.
     Google Scholar
  5. Bordo, M. D., & Rockoff, H. (2013). Not Just the Great Contraction: Friedman and Schwartz's A Monetary History of the United States 1867 to 1960. American Economic Review, 103(3), 61-65.
     Google Scholar
  6. Friedman, M., & Schwartz, A. J. (2008). A monetary history of the United States, 1867-1960. Princeton University Press.
     Google Scholar
  7. Rick, S., & Loewenstein, G. (2008). The role of emotion in economic behavior. Handbook of Emotions, 3, 138-158.
     Google Scholar
  8. Khuu, J., Durand, R. B., & Smales, L. A. (2016). Melancholia and Japanese stock returns – 2003 to 2012. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 40, 424–437.
     Google Scholar
  9. DeJuan, J. P., & Seater, J. J. (2006). A simple test of Friedman's permanent income hypothesis. Economica, 73(289), 27-46.
     Google Scholar
  10. Saisekar, A. (2012). Did consumers really change their consumption habits after the 2008 recession? A look into consumer expenditure using Milton Friedman’s permanent income hypothesis. https://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses/508.
     Google Scholar
  11. Nolan, P. (2007). Capitalism and freedom: The contradictory character of globalization. Anthem Press.
     Google Scholar
  12. Kroncke, C. (2018). Nudging toward a stable retirement. Politics & the Life Sciences, 37(1), 126–129.
     Google Scholar
  13. Mariyani-Squire, E. (2017). Critical reflections on a realist interpretation of Friedman’s ‘Methodology of Positive Economics’. Journal of Economic Methodology, 24(1), 69-89.
     Google Scholar
  14. Friedman, M. (1953). The methodology of positive economics. Retrieved from http://www.sfu.ca/~dandolfa/friedman-1966.pdf.
     Google Scholar
  15. Schwartz, A. (2015). Regulating for rationality. Stanford Law Review, 67(6), 1373–1410.
     Google Scholar
  16. Ariely, D. (2008). Predictably irrational: The hidden forces that shape our decisions. HarperCollins.
     Google Scholar