Mount Kenya University, Kenya
* Corresponding author
Mount Kenya University, Kenya

Article Main Content

Performance contracting is a strategic technique that uses feedback loops to meet desirable targets. Introduction of performance contracting by the government was seen as effective and hopeful method for improvement of the performance in public institutions and state agencies. Past Studies on Performance contracting, and Organization performance shows that there had never been a study on how Performance Contracting influences performance of County Referral Hospitals and there lay the research gap. The research main objective was to ascertain the effect of performance contracting results on organizations performance in Kapenguria County Referral Hospital. In a specific way, the study sought to find out how performance contract target setting influence performance of the Hospital. The target population was 291 employees of Kapenguria County Referral Hospital, the study used a stratified random sampling technique to get the sample size which was 184 employees. Descriptive research design was adopted by this study. The study utilized primary data mainly collected using structured questionnaires. The data collected was then analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics with the help of SPSS. Tables were used to present the results of the study. The study found out that there was a positive and significant relationship between Target setting and Organization performance, this, therefore, implied that setting of targets in performance contracting influenced the organizational performance. results of ANOVA established that there was a significant mean because the coefficients were all less than 0.05. lastly, all independent variables had statistically significant association with the dependent variable at 95% level of confidence. The study, therefore, concludes that performance contracting greatly influence organization performance. Going by high affirmation of the respondents, Performance contracting enhances assertion of more effort by employees to their duties and tasks, motivates employees when rewarded or recognized based on the results of evaluation, enhances work accountability in the organization among others. this study recommends that there should be adequate consultation and involvement of employees in setting of targets, this will lead to high employees’ commitment to the set targets and in turn enhance achievement of the general organizational targets.

References

  1. Borgogni, L., & Russo, S. D. (2013). A quantitative analysis of the high performance cycle in Italy. In E. A. Locke & G. P. Latham (Eds.), New developments in goal setting and task performance (pp. 270–283). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
     Google Scholar
  2. Cheche, S. (2014). A Critical Review of Literature Review on Performance Contracting. Global Journal of Trade and Administration. 3(6):65-70.
     Google Scholar
  3. Diallo, O. (2017) Performance Contracting Effects on Employee’s Motivation in the Senegalese Public Media Sector, American Journal of Research, Technology, and Science. 32, 132-148.
     Google Scholar
  4. DuBrin, A. J. (2012). Essentials of Management. Mason, OH: Cengage South-Western.
     Google Scholar
  5. Gakure, Eliud & Karanja. (2013). Role of Performance Contracting in Enhancing Effectiveness of Performance in the Civil Service in Kenya, State Department of Infrastructure, Jomo Kenyatta University of Science and Technology (JKUAT), Kenya.
     Google Scholar
  6. Gakure, R.W., Muriu, S. M.& Orwa, G. (2013). Role of Performance Contracting in Enhancing Effectiveness of Performance in the Civil Service in Kenya, State Department of Information. Business and Marketing Journal, 14(6), (Nov. - Dec. 2013), 73-82.
     Google Scholar
  7. Gekonde, T., Ochieng, P. & Lokapel, E. (2013). Performance Contract Impact on Public Service Delivery in Kenya: Review of Persons Registration in Kericho. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 3, 1-7.
     Google Scholar
  8. GOK, (2010). Evaluation of the Results for Kenyans Programme: Institute of Public Administration of Canada and the African Development Professional Group, Nairobi, Kenya: UNDP.
     Google Scholar
  9. GOK, (2013). Results for Kenyans: Capacity Building Programme for Transforming the Public Service, Public Service Reform and Development Secretariat.
     Google Scholar
  10. Greenberg, J. (2011). Behavior in organisations. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
     Google Scholar
  11. Julnes P., Berry S. F., Aristigueta M. P., & Yang, K. (2007). Promoting the Utilisation of Performance Measures in Public Organisations. International Handbook of Practice-Based Performance Management. 61(6).
     Google Scholar
  12. Kinanga, R.O. & Partoip, S.K. (2013). Linkage between target setting in performance contracting and employee performance: A view on Kenya. Journal of Research on Human Resources Administration.
     Google Scholar
  13. Kitsao s. Loice (2018), Performance Contracting and Perfromance of Parastatals in The Minisrty of Transport, Kenya.
     Google Scholar
  14. Kubaison, S. (2014). The Mediating Role of Employee Attitude on Participation-Performance Relationship in State owned Corporation in Kenya. International Journal of Research in Social Sciences.
     Google Scholar
  15. Letangule, S. L, & Letting, N. K. (2012). Effects of Performance Contract on Organization Performance. The case of Ministry of Education Kenya. International Journal of Management and Business Studies. 2, 29-37.
     Google Scholar
  16. Luthans, F. (2011). Organizational behavior. New York, NY: Mc Graw-Hill.
     Google Scholar
  17. Makewa, M. Rose & Were Susan, (2017), Influence of Performance Contracting on Organizational Performance of Public Universities in Kenya. International Journal of Innovative Development & Policy Studies.
     Google Scholar
  18. Mauya, E. N. (2015). The importance of setting performance targets on service delivery in performance contracting at the ministry of tourism, Kenya. Global Journal of Human Resource Management. 3(5), 1-8.
     Google Scholar
  19. Mbuthia R. N., Ngeri, B., & Mwangi, B. (2012). Effectiveness of Performance Contracting in Public Institutions. International Journal of Science and Research.
     Google Scholar
  20. Mutahaba, G. (2011). Report on adoption and use of performance management systems including performance measurement, monitoring, and evaluation in Africa.
     Google Scholar
  21. Ndung’u, M. N. (2009). Performance management and contracting: Kenyan perspective, Jitegemea Press, Nairobi Kenya.
     Google Scholar
  22. Newstrom, J. W. (2011). Organizational behavior (13th ed.). New York, NY: Mc Graw Hill.
     Google Scholar
  23. Nganyi, J. E., Shigogodi, J. M. & Owamo, A. (2014). The Effectiveness of Performance Contracting in Service Delivery in Public Universities in Kenya. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences. 4(10), 413-441, October.
     Google Scholar
  24. Ngetich, G. K. (2013). An investigation on the effects of performance contracting on service delivery. A Case study of the Nakuru Sub County. International Journal of Science and Research. 4, 1-7.
     Google Scholar
  25. Obong’o, S. O. (2009). Implementation of performance contracting in Kenya. Retrieved from http://www.ipmr.net
     Google Scholar
  26. Omondi, J. D. (2015). A Study on Effects of Performance Contracting Implementation on Service Delivery at Kenya Ports Authority. International Journal of Scientific Research.4(6).
     Google Scholar
  27. Owino, A. (2014). The Effectiveness of Performance Contracting in Service Delivery in Public Universities in Kenya. International journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences. 4, 1-7.
     Google Scholar
  28. Wagana, D. M. (2015). Analysis of the relationship between devolved governance, political decentralization, and service delivery. European Scientific Journal. ESJ, 11.
     Google Scholar
  29. Uusikyla, P., & Virtanen, P. (1999). Public Sector Performance Contracting in Finland Public Management Department, Finnish Ministry of Finance.
     Google Scholar
  30. Yukl, G. A., & Latham, G. P. (1978). Interrelationship among employee participation, individual differences, goal difficulty, goal acceptance, goal instrumentality, and performance Personnel psychology.
     Google Scholar