Leadership-Powerlessness and Workplace Governance: A Managerial Behavior Context
Article Main Content
The growth, sustainability and success of a corporate entity is largely predicated on its framework of interconnecting operational mechanisms, relationships, and processes. As a norm, statutory functions and institutions are enacted in firms to ensure that corporate obligated responsibilities, to themselves as well as their stakeholders, are carried out in a manner that bequeaths enormous benefits. It is a commonsensical expectation that persons saddled with the responsibility to drive these processes, possess requisite and commensurate capacity to act in positive organizational result-oriented directions. However, Executive functionaries in corporate entities seem incapacitated to the extent that the desirable outcomes are not achieved. This work was to determine the contextual behavioral implications of powerlessness in persons occupying leadership positions with a view to highlighting the psychological promptings of the leaders as well as the intruding influences militating against them. This will give a broad knowledge of the issues at stake and a clearer understanding of the solutions proffered. The apparent unencouraging outcomes of corporate entities in Nigeria gave the impetus to this Paper to explore Leadership-powerlessness as a function of the empowerment capacity levels of executive functionaries vis-à-vis workplace governance. This paper regards workplace governance as an end indicative of outcomes that make for growth, sustainability, and survival of corporate entities. The study also suggested ways forward that will mitigate the leadership-powerlessness quagmire.
References
-
Adnan, S. M., Hay, D.& Van Staden, C.J. (2018). The influence of culture and corporate governance on corporate social responsibility disclosure: A cross country analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 198, 820-832.
Google Scholar
1
-
Agere, S. (2000). Promoting good governance: Principle, practices and perspectives. London, United Kingdom: Commonwealth Secretariat.
Google Scholar
2
-
Bhagat, S. & Bolton, B. (2019). Corporate governance and firm performance: The sequel. Journal of Corporate Finance, 58, 142-168.
Google Scholar
3
-
Bhatt, P.R. & Bhatt, R.R. (2017). Corporate governance and firm performance in Malaysia, Corporate Governance, 17(5), 896-912.
Google Scholar
4
-
Ebun, O.D. (2016). Leadership and development in Nigeria: A critical analysis. International Journal of Politics and Good Governance, 7(7).
Google Scholar
5
-
Ejimabo, N.O. (2013). Understanding the Impact of Leadership in Nigeria: Its Reality, Challenges, and Perspectives. SAGE Open Access Journal. 3 (2).
Google Scholar
6
-
Galperin, B.L, Michaud, J., Senaji, T. A. & Taleb, A. (2019). Perception of Leadership Effectiveness among the African Diaspora in Canada USA.
Google Scholar
7
-
Heider, F. (1958). The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York: Wiley.
Google Scholar
8
-
IMF (2005). The IMF’s approach to promoting good governance and combating corruption: A guide. International Monetary Fund. Retrieved August 12, 2021from https://www.imf.org/external/np/gov/guide/eng/index.htm.
Google Scholar
9
-
Imhonopi, D. & Urim, U. M (2013). Leadership crisis and corruption in the Nigerian public sector: An albatross of national development. The African Symposium, 13(1), 78-87.
Google Scholar
10
-
Jeb, Blount (2012): People Follow You: The Real Secret to What Matters Most in Leadership. New Jersey: John Wiley &Sons Incorporation.
Google Scholar
11
-
Lituchy, T.R, Galperin, B. L & Punnett, B.J. (2017). LEAD: Leadership Effectiveness in Africa and the African Diaspora. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Google Scholar
12
-
McLeod, S. A. (2012). Attribution Theory. http://www.simplypsychology.org/attribution-theory.html. Retrieved on 10 October, 2021.
Google Scholar
13
-
Michaud, J., Lvina, E., Galperin, B. L., Lituchy, T. R., Punnett, B. J., Taleb, Alleyne, A. (2020). Development and validation of the Leadership Effectiveness in Africa and the Diaspora (LEAD) scale. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 20(3), 361–384.
Google Scholar
14
-
Rhodes, R. A. W. (2007). Understanding Governance: Ten Years On. Organization Studies, 28(8), 1243–1264.
Google Scholar
15
-
Rotberg, R. (2014).Good Governance Means Performance and Results. Governance. 27 (3): 511–518.
Google Scholar
16
-
Scherer, A.G. & Voegtlin, C. (2020). Corporate governance for responsible innovation: Approaches to corporate governance and their implications for sustainable development. AMP, 34, 182-208.
Google Scholar
17
-
Ugwuzor, M., (2021). Self-Destructive Work Behaviour Management for Socio- Economic Emancipation: A Classic Case of Saving One from Oneself. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 13(3(J), 34-43.
Google Scholar
18
-
World Bank (1992). Governance and development. Washington, D.C: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/ The World Bank.
Google Scholar
19





