Firm Characteristic and Fair Value Adoption in the Measurement of Biological Assets
Article Main Content
Research on how fair value adoption plays an essential role in changing accounting systems in companies. Therefore, this study was conducted to find out the firm characteristics affecting the application of fair value in companies in Vietnam. Statistical analysis technique through a logit model based on 186 companies shows that two business sizes and types of companies impact fair value adoption. In which large-scale companies tend to apply fair value higher than small enterprises. State-owned companies tend to apply fair value higher than joint stock companies operating in the community's interests.
References
-
Alp, A., & Ustundag, S. (2009). Financial reporting transformation: The experience of Turkey. Critical perspectives on Accounting, 20(5), 680-699.
Google Scholar
1
-
Anderson, M. G., Brown, P. F., & Cores, A. P. (1993). Market Substitution and Copyrights: Predicting Fair Use Case Law. U. Miami Ent. & Sports L. Rev., 10, 33.
Google Scholar
2
-
Argiles, J. M., Garcia-Blandon, J. G., & Monllau, T. (2011). Fair value versus historic cost-based valuation for biological assets: Predictability of financial information. Spanish Accounting Review.
Google Scholar
3
-
Fox, A., Hannah, G., Helliar, C., & Veneziani, M. (2013). The costs and benefits of IFRS implementation in the UK and Italy. Journal of Applied Accounting Research.
Google Scholar
4
-
GSO. (2021). Announcement of social - economic data for q3/2021
Google Scholar
5
-
Heidhues, E., & Patel, C. (2011). IFRS and exercise of accountants’ professional judgments: Insights and concerns from a German perspective. Working Paper, Macquarie University.
Google Scholar
6
-
Horton, J., Serafeim, G., & Serafeim, I. (2013). Does mandatory IFRS adoption improve the information environment?. Contemporary accounting research, 30(1), 388-423.
Google Scholar
7
-
James, M. L. (2011). Integrating international financial reporting standards into the accounting curriculum: strategies, benefits and challenges. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 15, 127.
Google Scholar
8
-
Jeanjean, T., & Stolowy, H. (2008). Do accounting standards matter? An exploratory analysis of earnings management before and after IFRS adoption. Journal of accounting and public policy, 27(6), 480-494.
Google Scholar
9
-
Jermakowicz, E. K. (2004). Effects of adoption of international financial reporting standards in Belgium: the evidence from BEL-20 companies. Accounting in Europe, 1(1), 51-70.
Google Scholar
10
-
Joshi, P. L., Bremser, W. G., & Al-Ajmi, J. (2008). Perceptions of accounting professionals in the adoption and implementation of a single set of global accounting standards: Evidence from Bahrain. Advances in Accounting, 24(1), 41-48.
Google Scholar
11
-
Jung, B., Pourjalali, H., Wen, E., & Daniel, S. J. (2013). The association between firm characteristics and CFO's opinions on the fair value option for non-financial assets. Advances in accounting, 29(2), 255-266.
Google Scholar
12
-
Tan, H., Wang, S., & Welker, M. (2011). Analyst following and forecast accuracy after mandated IFRS adoptions. Journal of accounting research, 49(5), 1307-1357.
Google Scholar
13
-
Tokar, M. (2005). Convergence and the implementation of a single set of global standards: the real-life challenge. Accounting in Europe, 2(1), 47-68.
Google Scholar
14
-
Tyrall et al (2007). The Relevance of international financial reporting standards to a developing country: evidence from Kazakhstan. The International Journal of Accounting 42(1):82-110.
Google Scholar
15
-
Walton, P. J. (Ed.). (2007). The Routledge companion to fair value and financial reporting. London: Routledge.
Google Scholar
16
-
Whittington, G. (2005). The adoption of international accounting standards in the European Union. European accounting review, 14(1), 127-153.
Google Scholar
17





