Disentangling Country and Firm Level Effects on Firm Equity Ownership and Firm Financial Performance: An Exploratory Empirical Analysis
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
This study attempts to disentangle firm and country level effects on firm performance and firm ownership using hierarchical linear modeling. I argue that distinguishing country and firm level effects is complex in that firm level characteristics and strategic decision making are not independent of the national context but are embedded in both the national context and firm level stakeholder pressures. The results suggest greater country level effects for ownership than for performance. This pattern of results is consistent with stronger national level influences on ownership structure than on performance outcomes. This finding may reflect trends toward homogeneity due to the globalization of financial markets. Although I found little evidence that the identity of the largest equity owner influenced performance outcomes, several ownership classes were significant for the equation predicting the size of the largest shareholding.
Downloads
References
-
Aguilera, R. V. & Jackson, G. (2003). The cross-national diversity of corporate governance: Dimensions and determinants. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 447-465.
Google Scholar
1
-
Aguilera, R. V. & Cuervo-Cazurra, A. (2004). Codes of Good Governance worldwide: What is the trigger? Organization Studies, 25(3), 415-443.
Google Scholar
2
-
Ahmadjian, C. L. & Robbins, G. E. (2005). A Clash of capitalisms: Foreign shareholders and corporate restructuring in 1990s Japan. American Sociological Review, 70(3), 451.
Google Scholar
3
-
Aoki, M. (1994). The Japanese firm as a system of attributes: a survey and research agenda. In M. Aoki, Dore, M. (Ed.), The Japanese firm: sources of competitive strength (pp. 11-40). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
4
-
Barr, P. S. & Glynn, M. A. (2004). Cultural variations in strategic issue interpretation: relating cultural uncertainty avoidance to controllability in discriminating threat and opportunity. Strategic Management Journal, 25(1), 59-67.
Google Scholar
5
-
Bebchuk, L. A. & Roe, M. J. (1999). A theory of path dependence in corporate ownership and governance. Stanford Law Review, 52(1), 127-170.
Google Scholar
6
-
Buck, T. & Shahrim, A. (2005). The translation of corporate governance changes across national cultures: the case of Germany. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(1), 42-62.
Google Scholar
7
-
Bushman, R. M., Piotroski, J. D., & Smith, A. J. (2004). What determines corporate transparency? Journal of Accounting Research, 42(2): 207-252.
Google Scholar
8
-
Chan, K., Corvig, V. M., & Ng, L. K. (2005). What determines the domestic bias and foreign bias? Evidence from mutual fund equity allocations worldwide. Journal of Finance, 60, 1495-1534.
Google Scholar
9
-
Chui, A. C. W., Lloyd, A. E., & Kwok, C. C. Y. (2002). The determination of capital structure: Is national culture a missing piece to the puzzle? Journal of International Business Studies, 33(1), 99-127.
Google Scholar
10
-
Cooke, T. E. & Wallace, R. S. O. (1990). Financial disclosure regulation and its environment: A review and further analysis. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 9, 79-110.
Google Scholar
11
-
Dahlquist, M. & Robertsson, G. (2001). Direct foreign ownership, institutional investors, and firm characteristics. Journal of Financial Economics, 59(3), 413-440.
Google Scholar
12
-
Dahya, J., Dimitrov, O., & McConnell, J. J. (2008). Dominant shareholders, corporate boards, and corporate value: A cross-country analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 87(1), 73-100.
Google Scholar
13
-
Dansereau, F., Jeewon, C., & Yammarino, F. J. (2006). Avoiding the "Fallacy of the wrong level". Group & Organization Management, 31(5), 536-577.
Google Scholar
14
-
Davis, G. F. (2005). New directions in corporate governance. Annual Review of Sociology, 31(1), 143-162.
Google Scholar
15
-
Davis, G. F. & Marquis, C. (2013). The globalization of stock markets and convergence in corporate governance. In V. Noe & R. Swedberg (Eds.), The Economic Sociology of Capitalist Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
16
-
Ding, Y., Jeanjean, T., & Stolowy, H. (2005). Why do national GAAP differ from IAS? The role of culture. International Journal of Accounting, 40, 325-350.
Google Scholar
17
-
Ding, Y., Hope, O.-K., Jeanjean, T., & Stolowy, H. (2007). Differences between domestic accounting standards and IAS: Measurement, determinants, and implications. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 26(1), 1-38.
Google Scholar
18
-
Djankov, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2008). The law and economics of self-dealing. Journal of Financial Economics, 88(3), 430-465.
Google Scholar
19
-
Djankov, S. D., La Porta, R., Lopez de Silanes, Florencio, S., Andrei, & Botero, J. C. (2004). The Regulation of labor. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(4), 1339-1382.
Google Scholar
20
-
Doidge, C., Andrew Karolyi, G., & Stulz, R. M. (2007). Why do countries matter so much for corporate governance? Journal of Financial Economics, 86(1), 1-39.
Google Scholar
21
-
Douma, S., George, R., & Kabir, R. (2006). Foreign and domestic ownership, business groups, and firm performance: evidence from a large emerging market. Strategic Management Journal, 27(7), 637-657.
Google Scholar
22
-
Durand, R. & McGuire, J. (2005). Legitimating agencies in the face of selection: The case of AACSB. Organization Studies, 26(2), 165-180.
Google Scholar
23
-
Fiss, P. C. & Zajac, E. J. (2004). The diffusion of ideas over contested terrain: The (non)adoption of a shareholder value orientation among German firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(4), 501-534.
Google Scholar
24
-
Fiss, P. C. (2006). Social influence effects and managerial compensation evidence from Germany. Strategic Management Journal, 27(11), 1013-1031.
Google Scholar
25
-
Frost, C. A., Gordon, E. A., & Hayes, A. F. (2006). Stock exchange disclosure and market development: An analysis of 50 international exchanges. Journal of Accounting Research, 44(3), 437-483.
Google Scholar
26
-
Gavin, M. & Hofmann, D. (2002). Using hierarchical linear modeling to investigate the moderating influence of leadership climate. Leadership Quarterly, 13(1), 15-33.
Google Scholar
27
-
Gedajlovic, E., Yoshikawa, T., & Hashimoto, M. (2005). Ownership structure, investment behavior and firm performance in Japanese manufacturing industries. Organization Studies, 26 (1), 7-35.
Google Scholar
28
-
Gleason, K. C., Mathur, L. K., & Mathur, I. (2000). The interrelationship between culture, capital structure, and performance: Evidence from European retailers. Journal of Business Research, 50(2), 185-191.
Google Scholar
29
-
Greenwood, R. & Subbay, R. (2006). Institutional entrepreneurship in mature fields: The Big Five accounting firms. Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), 27–48.
Google Scholar
30
-
Hennart, J.-F. & Larimo, J. (1998). The impact of culture on the strategy of multinational enterprises: Does national origin affect ownership decisions? Journal of International Business Studies, 29(3), 515-538.
Google Scholar
31
-
Heritage Foundation (2022, May 3). The economic and business freedom index. www.heritage.org
Google Scholar
32
-
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's consequences: International differences in work related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
33
-
Jones, G. K. & Teegen, H. J. (2001). Global R&D activity of US MNCs: does national culture affect investment decisions? Multinational Business Review, 9(2), 1-7.
Google Scholar
34
-
Jong, E. D. & Semenov, R. (2006). Cultural determinants of ownership concentration across countries. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 2(1,2), 145.
Google Scholar
35
-
Kwok, C. C. Y. & Tadesse, S. (2006). National culture and financial systems. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(2), 227-247.
Google Scholar
36
-
La Porta, R., Lopez de Silanes, F., Schleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1998). Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106(6), 1113-1155.
Google Scholar
37
-
La Porta, R., Lopez de Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (1999). Corporate governance around the world. Journal of Finance, 54(2), 471-517.
Google Scholar
38
-
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (2000). Investor protection and corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1,2), 3-27.
Google Scholar
39
-
La Porta, R., Lopez-De-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (2002). Investor protection and corporate valuation. Journal of Finance, 57(3), 1147-1170.
Google Scholar
40
-
La Porta, R., Lopez de Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2006). What works in securities laws? Journal of Finance, 61(1), 446-459
Google Scholar
41
-
Lee, S. M. & Peterson, S. J. (2000). Culture, entrepreneurial orientation, and global competitiveness. Journal of World Business, 35(4), 401-416.
Google Scholar
42
-
Levine, R. (1997). Financial development and economic growth: Views and agenda. Journal of Economic Literature, 35(2), 688-726.
Google Scholar
43
-
Licht, A. N. (2001). The mother of all path dependencies: Toward a cross-cultural theory of corporate governance systems. Delaware Journal of Corporate Law, 26, 147-205.
Google Scholar
44
-
Lins, K. & Servaes, H. (1999). International evidence on the value of corporate diversification. Journal of Finance, 54(6), 2215-2243.
Google Scholar
45
-
Martin, K. D., Cullen, J. B., Johnson, J. L., & Parboteeah, K. P. (2007). Deciding to bribe: A cross-level analysis of firm and home country influences on bribery activity. Academy of Management Journal, 50(6), 1401-1422.
Google Scholar
46
-
Misangyi, V. F., Weaver, G. R., & Elms, H. (2008). Ending corruption: The interplay among institutional logics, resources, and institutional entrepreneurs. Academy of Management Review, 33(3), 750-770.
Google Scholar
47
-
Park, H. (1998). The effect of national culture on the capital structure of firms. International Journal of Management, 15(2), 204-212.
Google Scholar
48
-
Pedersen, T. & Thomsen, S. (1997). European patterns of corporate ownership: A twelve-country study. Journal of International Business Studies, 28(4), 759-778.
Google Scholar
49
-
Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. New York: Free Press.
Google Scholar
50
-
Scully, G. W. (1988). The institutional framework and economic development. Journal of Political Economy, 96(3), 652-662.
Google Scholar
51
-
Sekely, W. S. & Collins, J. M. (1988). Cultural influences on international capital structure. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(1), 87-100.
Google Scholar
52
-
Thomsen, S. & Pedersen, T. (2000). Ownership structure and economic performance in the largest European companies. Strategic Management Journal, 21(6), 689-705.
Google Scholar
53
-
Wieseke, J., Lee, N., Broderick, A. J., Dawson, J. F., & van Dick, R. (2008). Multilevel analyses in marketing research: Differentiating analytical outcomes. Journal of Marketing Theory & Practice, 16(4), 321-339.
Google Scholar
54
-
Yoshikawa, T., Phan, P., & Gedajlovic, E. (2002). The impact of global capital market exposure and stable ownership on investor relations practices and performance of Japanese firms. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19(4), 525-540.
Google Scholar
55
Most read articles by the same author(s)
-
Mario Krenn,
The Government as Institutional Entrepreneur in Corporate Governance Reform , European Journal of Business and Management Research: Vol. 7 No. 5 (2022)