The Effect of Job Motivation, Job Satisfaction and Transformational Leadership Style on Employee



Abstract Views
1272

Downloads
908

Citations

Share

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Submitted Apr 26, 2022
Published May 24, 2022
10.24018/ejbmr.2022.7.3.1418

Abstract viewed = 1272 times

Table of Contents

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Background: Employee performance in an organization is influenced by several factors such as: work motivation, job satisfaction and transformational leadership style, if all of them are fulfilled properly then the performance of employees will increase. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of work motivation, job satisfaction and transformational leadership style on employee performance in Class D Hospital.

Research Methods: This research method uses a quantitative approach with a causal design based on cross-sectional time dimensions. The population in this study used 60 employees as a saturated sample. The data collection technique is in the form of a questionnaire with a measurement scale using a Likert scale. Analysis of the data in this study using multiple regression analysis.

Result: It is known that the coefficient of determination or R Square is 0.774 or equal to 77.4%. This figure means that the variables of work motivation (X1), job satisfaction (X2) and transformational leadership style (X3) affect the performance of employees in class D Hospital by 77.4%.

Implications: Work motivation, job satisfaction and transformational leadership style have a positive effect on employee performance.

Keywords: Employee Performance, Job Satisfaction, Transformational Leadership Style, Work Motivation

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Bass & Avolio, (1994). Improving Organizational Effectiveness Through Transformational Leadership. London: SAGE Publications.
     Google Scholar
  2. Brown, S. D., & Lent, R. W. (2017). Social Cognitive Career Theory in a Diverse World: Closing Thoughts. Journal of Career Assessment, 25(1), 173–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072716660 061.
     Google Scholar
  3. Burn, J.M. (1978) Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.
     Google Scholar
  4. Deci, E. L., Gagné, M., Ryan, R. M., et al. (2018). Self-determination theory applied to work motivation and organizational behavior. In D. S. Ones, N. Anderson, C. Viswesvaran, & H. K. Sinangil (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of industrial, work & organizational psychology: Organizational psychology, 97–121. Sage Reference.
     Google Scholar
  5. Herzberg, F.I. (1966). Work and the nature of man. World.
     Google Scholar
  6. Jaroliya, D. & Gyanchandani, R. (2022). Transformational leadership style: a boost or hindrance to team performance in IT sector. Vilakshan – XIMB Journal of Management, 19(1), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1108/XJM-10-2020-0167.
     Google Scholar
  7. Krech, D., & Crutchfield, R. S. (1948). Group morale and leadership. In D. Krech & R. S. Crutchfield, Theory and problems of social psychology, 404–440. McGraw-Hill. https://doi.org/10.1037 /10024-011.
     Google Scholar
  8. Lewis, A. N. (2017). Advancing Rehabilitation Counseling: Leadership, Research, and Positioning the Profession in 2018 and Beyond. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 48(3). DOI: 10.1891/0047-2220.48.3.12.
     Google Scholar
  9. Nitisemito, A. (2016). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Edisi 2 Jilid 3. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga.
     Google Scholar
  10. Putra, E.D., Cho, S., Liu, J., et al. (2015). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation on work engagement in the hospitality industry: Test of motivation crowding theory. 17, 228-241. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1467358415613393.
     Google Scholar
  11. Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2017). Essentials of Organizational Behavior (14th ed.). Pearson.
     Google Scholar
  12. Robbins, S. P., & Coulter, M. (2017). Management (13E) New Jersey, Pearson Education.
     Google Scholar
  13. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org /10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68.
     Google Scholar
  14. Soomro, A.A., Breitenecker, R.J., Shah, S.A.M., et al. (2018). Relation of work-life balance, work-family conflict, and family-work conflict with the employee performance-moderating role of job satisfaction. South Asian Journal of Business Studies, 7(1), 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAJBS-02-2017-0018.
     Google Scholar
  15. Stewart, A. J., & Ostrove, J. M. (1998). Women’s personality in middle age: Gender, history, and midcourse corrections. American Psychologist, 53, 1185–1194.
     Google Scholar
  16. Suharto dan Cahyo. (2005). Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi, Kepemimpinan Dan Motivasi Terhadap Kinerja Sumber Daya Manusia Di Sekretariat DPRD Propinsi Jawa Tengah. JRBI. Vol 1. No 1. Hal: 13–30.
     Google Scholar
  17. Yang, F. (2016). The Effects of Compensation Schemes and Performance Feedback on Employee’s Self-Selection: An Experimental Investigation. Experiments in Organizational Economics (Research in Experimental Economics, vol. 19), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp. 159-187. https://doi.org/10.1108 /S0193-230620160000019006.
     Google Scholar
  18. Yukl, G. (2018). Leadership in organizations (9th ed.). Pearson India.
     Google Scholar
  19. Yuwalliatin, Sitty. (2006). Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi, Motivasi Dan Komitmen Terhadap Kinerja Serta Pengaruhnya Terhadap Keunggulan Kompetitif Dosen UNISULA Semarang. EKOBIS. 7(2), 241–256.
     Google Scholar