Diversifying Business Models and Bank Stability



Abstract Views
293

Downloads
365

Citations

Share

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Submitted May 13, 2022
Published Jun 20, 2022
10.24018/ejbmr.2022.7.3.1447

Abstract viewed = 293 times

Table of Contents

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Research on banking sustainability plays an important role for banks in the growing financial market. As a result, banks must compete more, making the risk of weak banks increase. This study was conducted to evaluate the impact of business models on bank stability — analytical data on joint-stock commercial banks listed on the Vietnam stock exchange from 2012 to 2019. The panel data regression analysis model with a generalized method of moments (GMM) is used to analyze the results. The GMM results show that net interest income (NII) has a positive effect on bank stability. On the other hand, non-interest income (NNII and TRADE) has a negative impact on bank stability. This result indicates that business models are having a negative impact on bank stability. The study also points out several implications for improving the sustainability of banks.

Keywords: business model bank risk bank stability diversification

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Abuzayed, B., Al-Fayoumi, N., & Molyneux, P. (2018). Diversification and bank stability in the GCC. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions, and Money, 57, 17-43.
     Google Scholar
  2. DeYoung, R., & Torna, G. (2013). Nontraditional banking activities and bank failures during the financial crisis. Journal of financial intermediation, 22(3), 397-421.
     Google Scholar
  3. Drucker, S., & Puri, M. (2009). On loan sales, loan contracting, and lending relationships. The Review of Financial Studies, 22(7), 2835-2872.
     Google Scholar
  4. Froot, K. A., & Stein, J. C. (1998). Risk management, capital budgeting, and capital structure policy for financial institutions: an integrated approach. Journal of financial economics, 47(1), 55-82.
     Google Scholar
  5. Froot, K. A., Scharfstein, D. S., & Stein, J. C. (1993). Risk management: Coordinating corporate investment and financing policies. the Journal of Finance, 48(5), 1629-1658.
     Google Scholar
  6. Heffernan, S. (2005). Modern banking. John Wiley & Sons.
     Google Scholar
  7. Köhler, M. (2015). Which banks are more risky? The impact of business models on bank stability. Journal of Financial Stability, 16, 195-212.
     Google Scholar
  8. Mahdaleta, E., Muda, I., & Nasir, G. M. (2016). Effects of capital structure and profitability on corporate value with company size as the moderating variable of manufacturing companies listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange. Academic Journal of Economic Studies, 2(3), 30-43.
     Google Scholar
  9. Nguyen, D. N., Nguyen, D. D., & Nguyen, D. V. (2020). Distribution information safety and factors affecting the intention to use digital banking in Vietnam. Journal of Distribution Science, 18(6), 83-91.
     Google Scholar
  10. Mergaerts, F., & Vander Vennet, R. (2016). Business models and bank performance: A long-term perspective. Journal of Financial Stability, 22, 57-75.
     Google Scholar
  11. Nguyen, T. T., Ho, H. H., Nguyen, D. V., Pham, A. C., & Nguyen, T. T. (2021). The Effects of Business Model on Bank's Stability. International Journal of Financial Studies, 9(3), 46. Yip, A. W., & Bocken, N. M. (2018). Sustainable business model archetypes for the banking industry. Journal of cleaner production, 174, 150-169.
     Google Scholar
  12. Sissy, A. M., Amidu, M., & Abor, J. Y. (2017). The effects of revenue diversification and cross border banking on risk and return of banks in Africa. Research in International Business and Finance, 40, 1-18.
     Google Scholar
  13. Trivedi, S. R. (2015). Banking innovations and new income streams: impact on banks' performance. Vikalpa, 40(1), 28-41.
     Google Scholar
  14. Williams, B. (2016). The impact of non-interest income on bank risk in Australia. Journal of Banking & Finance, 73, 16-37.
     Google Scholar