Research Article

The Seeds of Accounting Conservatism

David S. Christensen
Southern Utah University, USA
* Corresponding author
DOI icon 10.24018/ejbmr.2023.8.2.1897

Read Counter
1347

Downloads
878

Citations

Share

Article Sidebar

Submitted 2023-03-01
Published 2023-03-27

Read counter = 1347 times

Table of Contents

Article Main Content

Why does the accounting principle of accounting conservatism persist, despite the criticism of 20th-century deductive accounting theorists? Accounting conservatism's etymology suggests that the traditional connotation of deliberate understatement began in America, circa 1900. Its genealogy, however, reaches much deeper into the past. This research adds to the work of Basu (1997, 2009) who reports evidence of accounting conservatism in medieval Europe and China, and to the work of Bloom (2018) and Watts (2003), who provide modern rationales for accounting conservatism. By using key elements derived from its definition, accounting conservatism's genealogy is traced from ancient times to the 20th century. A review of major works on accounting history and notable articles on accounting conservatism reveals that the seeds of accounting conservatism predate Pacioli, and were sown for largely pragmatic reasons. As long as accounting retains its pragmatic flavor, accounting conservatism will likely survive its critics. It has passed the test of time.

Keywords: Accounting Conservatism Accounting History Accounting Principles Lower of Cost or Market

References

  1. Accounting Principles Board (1970). Basic concepts and accounting principles underlying financial statements of business enterprises. Statement of the Accounting Principles Board. APB Statement No. 4. Stamford, Connecticut: Financial Accounting Standards Board (October).
     Google Scholar
  2. American Accounting Association. (1936). A Tentative Statement of Accounting Principles Underlying Corporate Financial Statements. New York: American Accounting Association.
     Google Scholar
  3. American Accounting Association. (1957). Accounting and Reporting Standards for Corporate Financial Statements. New York: American Accounting Association.
     Google Scholar
  4. American Accounting Association. (1966). A Statement of Basic Accounting Theory. Evanston, Illinois: American Accounting Association.
     Google Scholar
  5. Basu, S. (1997). The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 24(1), 3– 37.
     Google Scholar
  6. Basu, S. (2009). Conservatism research: historical development and future prospects. China Journal of Accounting Research, 2. (Apr), 1-20.
     Google Scholar
  7. Bloom. R. (2018). Conservatism in accounting: a reassessment. Accounting Historians Journal, 45 (December), pp. 1-15.
     Google Scholar
  8. Brief, R. P. (1965). Nineteenth century accounting error. Journal of Accounting Research, 3 (Spring), 12-31.
     Google Scholar
  9. Byrne, G. (1937). To What Extent Can the Practice of Accounting Be Reduced to Rules and Standards? The Journal of Accountancy, 44 (November), 364-379.
     Google Scholar
  10. Chatfield, M. (1977). A History of Accounting Thought. Huntington, New York: Robert E. Krieger Publishing Company.
     Google Scholar
  11. DeRoover, R. (1955). New perspectives on the history of accounting. The Accounting Review, 30 (July), 405-20.
     Google Scholar
  12. DeRoover, R. (1963). The Rise and Decline of The Medici Bank: 1397-1494. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
     Google Scholar
  13. Devine, C. T. (1963). The rule of accounting conservatism reexamined. Journal of Accounting Research, 1(Autumn), 127-138.
     Google Scholar
  14. Financial Accounting Standards Board. (1970). Qualitative characteristics of accounting information. Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts No. 2. Stamford, Connecticut: Financial Accounting Standards Board (May).
     Google Scholar
  15. Gilman, S. (1939). Accounting Concepts of Profit. New York: The Ronald Press Co.
     Google Scholar
  16. Grady, P. (1962). Memoirs and Accounting Thought of George O. May. New York: Ronald Press.
     Google Scholar
  17. Grady, P. (1965). Inventory of generally accepted accounting principles for business enterprises. Accounting Research Study No. 7. New York: AICPA.
     Google Scholar
  18. Hamilton, R. (1788). An Introduction to Merchandise.
     Google Scholar
  19. Hatfield, H. R. (1913). Modern Accounting. New York: D. Appleton and Company.
     Google Scholar
  20. Hatfield, H. R. (1927). What is the matter with accounting? The Journal of Accountancy, 44(August), 267-279.
     Google Scholar
  21. Hayes, R. (1741). The Gentleman’s Complete Book-keeper.
     Google Scholar
  22. International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). (2018). IASB completes revisions to its conceptual framework. Retrieved from: https://www.ifrs.org/news-and-events/news/2018/03/iasb-completes-revisions-to-its-conceptual-framework/.
     Google Scholar
  23. Jones, E. T. (1797). Jones’s English System of Book-keeping.
     Google Scholar
  24. Littleton, A. C. (1941). A genealogy for 'cost or market’. The Accounting Review, 16 (June), 161-167.
     Google Scholar
  25. MacNeal, K. (1939). Truth in Accounting. Lawrence, Kansas: Scholars' Book Co.
     Google Scholar
  26. May, G. O. (1943). Financial Accounting, A Distillation of Experience. New York: The Macmillan Co.
     Google Scholar
  27. May, G. O. (1954). Concepts of business income and their implementation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 68 (February), 1-18.
     Google Scholar
  28. Morrison, J. (1813). The Elements of Book Keeping, by single & double entry. Longman, Hurst.
     Google Scholar
  29. Parker, R. H. (1965). Lower of cost and market in Britain and the United States: an historical survey. Abacus (December), 156-172.
     Google Scholar
  30. Paton, W. A. (1948). Accounting procedures and private enterprise. Journal of Accounting, 85 (April), 278-287.
     Google Scholar
  31. Peele, (1569). The Pathway to Perfectness.
     Google Scholar
  32. Previts, G. J., & Merino, B. D. (1979). A History of Accounting in America. New York: Ronald Press.
     Google Scholar
  33. Robinson, H. W. (1964). A History of Accounts in Ireland. Dublin: Institute of Chartered Accountants in Ireland.
     Google Scholar
  34. Sampson, A. (1965). Anatomy of Britain Today. London: Hoddler and Stoughton.
     Google Scholar
  35. Sanders, T., Hatfield, H., & Moore, U. (1938). A Statement of Accounting Principles. New York: American Institute of Accountants.
     Google Scholar
  36. Savary, J. (1676). The Perfect Merchant.
     Google Scholar
  37. Scott, D. R. (1926). Accounting conservatism in inventory valuation. The Accounting Review, 1 (March), 18-30.
     Google Scholar
  38. Sprouse, R. T., & Moonitz, M. (1962). A tentative set of broad accounting principles for business enterprises. Accounting Research Study No. 3. New York: AICPA.
     Google Scholar
  39. Sterling, R. R. (1967). Accounting conservatism: the fundamental principle of valuation in traditional accounting. Abacus, 3 (December), 109-132.
     Google Scholar
  40. The Scribner-Bantam English Dictionary. (1980). 4th edition. New York: Bantam Books, Inc.
     Google Scholar
  41. Vance, L. L. (1943). The authority of history in inventory valuation. The Accounting Review, 28(July), 219-227.
     Google Scholar
  42. Watts, R. (2003). Conservatism in Accounting, Part I. Explanations and Implications. Accounting Horizons, 17(September), 207-221.
     Google Scholar