##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

In contrast to earlier years, the Town Hall currently serves as a multifunctional space encompassing a park, a recreational facility, and a venue for fulfilling one’s daily physical training requirements. Batu Bara Berjaya (BBB) and its staff, including contractors and subcontractors, are currently seeking an increase in visitor numbers. This thesis aimed to identify authentic challenges, ascertain the optimal business line for Town Hall, and explore strategies for Town Hall to effectively compete with other prominent attractions in East Kutai, thereby reclaiming its position as the preferred destination. The research methodology integrates both qualitative and quantitative descriptive approaches. The data collection process involved the administration of questionnaires, conducting interviews, making field observations, and reviewing relevant literature. In qualitative analysis, data is subjected to various analytical techniques such as Stakeholder Analysis, Kepner-Tregoe Analysis (K-T Analysis), 5 Whys Analysis, Porter’s Five Forces Analysis, and Value Co-Creation Analysis. On the other hand, quantitative analysis involves using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Analysis to process data. The study’s findings demonstrated that applying the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) suggests that the Town Hall ought to prioritise developing the Sports Centre. Subsequently, the Culinary Area and Hangout Places should be considered as secondary options. According to Porter’s Five Forces framework, the Town Hall can be classified as operating moderately. Alternatively, it could be subject to competition in its role as a tourist destination, notwithstanding the challenges associated with accessing it. Furthermore, the researchers propose utilising the Value Co-Creation Analysis framework to convert town halls into viable and enduring tourist destinations.

The results of the study indicate that based on AHP calculations, the Town Hall should prioritize the Sports Center as the primary development option, followed by the Culinary Area and Hangout Places. Then, based on Porter's Five Forces, the Town Hall is at the Moderate level, or it can be contested again to compete as a place to visit, despite the difficulty of the path. And ultimately, the authors of this study suggest employing the Value Co-Creation Analysis framing to transform town halls into sustainable visitor destinations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Bayuadi, M. W., Sudarwanto, B., & Pandelaki, E. E. (2020). City parks development by means of outdoor coworking space after the COVID-19 pandemic. Arsitektura, 18(2), 303-314.
     Google Scholar
  2. Bruijl, G. H. Th. (2018). The relevance of Porter’s Five Forces in today’s innovative and changing business environment. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1.
     Google Scholar
  3. Eden, C., & Ackerman, F. (2011). Making strategy: The journey of strategic management (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
     Google Scholar
  4. Kanbanize. (2023). 5 Whys: The ultimate root cause analysis tool. Retrieved from kanbanize.com: https://kanbanize.com/lean-management/improvement/5-whys-analysis-tool
     Google Scholar
  5. Kepner, C. H., & Tregoe, B. (1997). The new rational manager. Princeton Research Press.
     Google Scholar
  6. Kijima, K., & Arai, Y. (n.d.). Value co-creation process and value orchestration platform. Kijima-lab.com. https://www.kijima-lab.com/alumni/dl/160312_K-Kijma-Chapter1Editing.pdf.
     Google Scholar
  7. Mohammed, A. O., & Harputlugil, T. (2020). Conceptual framework for a decision-making model based on the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to select the best public-private partnership (PPP) model for airports. International Conference on Civil Engineering, Construction Management & Structural Design (CCS 2017). New Zealand Acad Applied Research.
     Google Scholar
  8. Pichler, R. (2015, November 17). Getting stakeholder engagement. Romanpichler.com. https://www.romanpichler.com/blog/stakeholder-engagement-analysis-power-interest-grid/.
     Google Scholar
  9. Porter, M. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 03. https://hbr.org/1979/03/how-competitive-forces-shape-strategy.
     Google Scholar
  10. ProductPlan. (n.d.). Stakeholder analysis. ProductPlan. https://www.productplan.com/glossary/stakeholder-analysis/.
     Google Scholar
  11. Purwanto, E. (2014). Privatisasi ruang publik dari civic centre menjadi central business district (Belajar dari kasus Kawasan Simpang Lima Semarang) [Privatization of public space from civic centre to central business district (A case study of Simpang Lima Area Semarang)]. Tata Loka, 16(3), 153-167.
     Google Scholar
  12. Saaty, T. L. (1993a). Decision making for leader: The analytical hierarchy process for decisions in complex world. Pustaka Binaman Pressindo.
     Google Scholar
  13. Saaty, T. L. (1993b). The analytical hierarchy process: Planning, priority, setting, resource allocation. University of Pittsburgh Press.
     Google Scholar
  14. Setionurjaya, A., & Tyas, W. P. (2018). The perception study of the community of Jakarta to the Gelora Bung Karno urban heritage area. Jurnal Pembangunan Wilayah dan Kota, 14(2), 83-93.
     Google Scholar