Palli Karma Sahayak Foundation (PKSF), Bangladesh
* Corresponding author

Article Main Content

Criticisms are aplenty that formal credit system such as microcredit is not inclusive to cater for the need of smallholder farmers. This paper analyses the existing literature to find out the limitation of microcredit to fulfil the need of smallholder farmers. The paper found that microcredit for smallholder farmers encompasses either ex ante flexibility or ex post flexibility. However, smallholder farmers need both ex ante and ex post flexibility due to their small, irregular and uncertain income. The current paper suggests that there is a need to revise existing microcredit modality by including both ex ante and ex post flexibility in order to make microcredit more inclusive for smallholder farmers.

References

  1. Isaga, N. "Access to bank credit by smallholder farmers in Tanzania : a case study", Africa Focus, Volume, 35, Nr. 1, pp 241-256, August 2018.
     Google Scholar
  2. Morvant-Roux, S. ''Is Microfinance the Adequate Tool to Finance Agriculture.'', in Beatriz, A. and Labie, M. The Handbook of Microfinance, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd, April 2011.
     Google Scholar
  3. Deininger, K. and Jin, R. ''Tenure security and land-related investment: evidence from Ethiopia.'', European Economic Revie, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 1245-1277, 2006.
     Google Scholar
  4. Banerjee, A. and Duflo, E. ''The economic lives of the poor.'', Journal of Economic Perspect, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 141–168, Winter 2007.
     Google Scholar
  5. Binswanger, H. and Deininger, K. ''Explaining agricultural and agrarian policies in developing countries.'', Economic Literature, vol. 35, pp. 1958-2005, February 1997.
     Google Scholar
  6. Collins, D., Morduch, J., Rutherford, S. and Ruthven, O. ''Portfolios of the Poor: How the World's Poor Live on $2 a Day'', Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press, 2009.
     Google Scholar
  7. Reyes, A. and Lensink, R. ''The credit constraints of market-oriented farmers in Chile'', Journal of Development Studies, vol. 47, pp. 1851-1868, January 2011.
     Google Scholar
  8. Weber, R. and Musshoff, O. ''Is agricultural microcredit really more risky? Evidence from Tanzania'', Agricultural Finance Review, vol. 72, 2012.
     Google Scholar
  9. Weber, R. and Musshoff, O. ''Can flexible microfinance loans improve credit access for farmers?'', Agricultural Finance Review, vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 255-271, 2013.
     Google Scholar
  10. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) ''A data portrait of smallholder farmers", ROME, 2010.
     Google Scholar
  11. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). ''International Year of Family Farming" April–May 2014 available at: http://www.fao.org/family-farming-2014/en/
     Google Scholar
  12. World Bank "World Development Report 2007: Agricuture for Development". World Bank, Washiton DC: World Bank, 2008
     Google Scholar
  13. Djurfeldt, G. 'Defining and operationalizing family farming from a sociological perspective', Rural Sociology, vol. 36, pp. 340–351, December 1996.
     Google Scholar
  14. Kritzinger, A. and Vorster, J. ''The Conceptualization of Farm Family Business: Deciduous Fruit Farming in South Africa.'', Sociologia Ruralis, vol. 37, pp. 114–133, 1997.
     Google Scholar
  15. Aksoy, A., Javier, B., Covarrubias, K. and Zezza, A. "Household Income Structures in Low-income Countries", in Aksoy, A. and Hoekman, B. Food Prices and Rural Poverty, Washington, D.C: World Bank, May 2010.
     Google Scholar
  16. Anderson, J. and Christen, R.P. "Segmentation of Smallholder Households: Meeting theRange of Financial Needs in Agricultural Families", CGAP Focus Noe, vol. 85, April 2013.
     Google Scholar
  17. Delberg ''Catalyzing Smallholder Agricultural Finance'', New York: Delberg, September 2012
     Google Scholar
  18. Merchetti, P. ''The Fonde de Desarrollo Local, an atypical MFI: the dream unleasing the potential of the peasantry and the praxis needed to acheive it.'', Class lecture presented at European Microfinance Program (EMP) on November, 2015.
     Google Scholar
  19. Anderson, J. and Ahmed, W. "SMALLHOLDER DIARIES: Building the Evidence Base with Farming Families in Mozambique, Tanzania, and Pakistan", Consultative Group to Assist the Poor (CGAP), vol. Perspective 2, March 2016.
     Google Scholar
  20. Hossain, M., Chakraborty, B., Jaim, W., Hossain, M.A., Malek, M. and Ahmed Md. Shakil, H. "Impact Assessment of Credit Programme for the Tenant Farmers:Baseline Report 2012, Dhaka: BRAC, 2012.
     Google Scholar
  21. Dellien, H. and Lynch, E. "Rural Finance for Small Farmers: An Integrated Approach", WWB Focus Note, 2007.
     Google Scholar
  22. Anderson, J. and Ahmed, W.) "Early Insight from Financial Diaries of Small holder Households", CGAP Focus Note, vol. 102, March 2015.
     Google Scholar
  23. Diagne, A. and Zeller, M. "Access to credit and its impact on Welfare in Malawi'', International Food Policy Reseach Institute (IFPRI) Reseach Report, vol. Reseach Report:116, February 2001.
     Google Scholar
  24. Anderson, J. and Learch, C. "National Survey and Segmentation of Smallholder Households in Mozambique-Understanding Their Demand for Financial, Agricultural, and Digital Solutions'', CGAP, March 2016.
     Google Scholar
  25. Burritt, K. Expanding Access To Financial Services In Malawi, New York: United Nations Capital Development Fund, March 2006.
     Google Scholar
  26. Armendariz, B. and Morduch, J. "Microfinance beyond group lending', Economics of Transition'', vol. 8, pp. 401-420, 2000.
     Google Scholar
  27. Labie, M., Laureti, C. and Szafarz, A. ''Discipline and Flexibility: A Behavioral Perspective on Product Design in Microfinance'', CEB Working paper, vol. 15/20, May 2015.
     Google Scholar
  28. Hamp, M. and Laureti, C. ''Balancing flexibility and discipline in microfinance: Innovative financial products that benefit clients and service providers'', CEB Working Paper, vol. 11/044, October 2011.
     Google Scholar
  29. Zeller, M. "Models of Rural Financial Institutions, Paving the Way Forward for Rural Finance: An International Conference on Best Practices" March 2008.
     Google Scholar
  30. Briones, R. ''Do Small Farmers Borrow Less when the Lending rate Increases? The Case of Rice Farming in the Philippines'', Munich Personal RePEc Archive, vol. 6044, December, 2007.
     Google Scholar
  31. Townsend, R.M. and Yaron, J. 'The credit risk-contingency system of an Asian development', Economic Perspectives, vol. QIII, pp. pp. 31–48, 2001.
     Google Scholar
  32. Acharya, V.V., Almeida, H. and Campello, M. "Aggregate Risk and the Choice between Cash and Lines of Credit.", Journal of Finance, vol. 68, no. 5, pp. 2059–2116, May 2013.
     Google Scholar
  33. Karlan, D. and Mullainathan, S. "Is Microfinance too Rigid?" India: Centre for Micro Finance, Institute for Financial Management and Research, 2006.
     Google Scholar
  34. Jeon, D.-S., Menicucci and Domenico ''When is the Optimal Lending Contract in Microfinance State Non-Contingent?', European Economic Review, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 720-731, 2011.
     Google Scholar
  35. Boot, AWA. ''Relationship Banking: What Do We Know?'', Journal of Financial Intermediation 9 (1): 7–25., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 7-25, January 2000.
     Google Scholar
  36. McIntosh, C. ''Estimating Treatment Effects form Spatial Policy Experiments—An Application to Ugandan Microfinance. ', Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 15-18, February 2008.
     Google Scholar
  37. Field, E., Pande, R., Papp, J. and Rigol., N. ''Does the Classic Microfinance Model Discourage Entrepreneurship among the Poor?'', American Economic Review, vol. 103, no. 6, pp. 2196–2226, October 2013.
     Google Scholar
  38. Christen, R.P. and Pearce, D. 'Managing Risk and Designing product for agricultural microfinance: Features of an em
     Google Scholar