##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

  •   Khoi Le Nguyen Doan

Abstract

Organic products remain a niche market in most countries and there is relatively little international trade in organic aquaculture products (Smith et al., 2005). The newly emergent organic products tend to exclude small-holders due to reasons of high certification costs, smaller volumes they produce, and tighter control of product quality. The paper looks at some of the opportunities that exist for small-holders to enter organic schemes and compete in the niche markets. Importantly, the constraints and risks that are involved will be debated. The ability of small farmers to organize and obtain the certification is questioned and the mechanisms to facilitate this will be discussed. The value chain concept, quality management, the theory of institutions and transaction cost economics, will be applied to analyze how the coordinated efforts of various stakeholders can be developed to achieve a better product quality and quality assurance.

Keywords: organic Pangasius, quality assurance, governance, small-holders, value chains

References

Asche, F., Khatun, F., (2006). Aquaculture: Issues and Opportunities for Sustainable Production and Trade. Natural Resources, International Trade and Sustainable Development.

Bakker, K. (2007). Vietnamese Pangasius industry: Current practices, developments and implications for export to the European Union. Solid Aquaculture solutions.

Delgado, Christopher et al., (2003), Fish to 2020 – Supply and demand in changing global markets. International Food Policy Research Institute. Penang, Malaysia: WorldFish Center.

Golafshani, N., (2003), Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research, the qualitative report, Vol 8, No. 4, 597-607.

Huss, H., H., Ababouch, L., Gram, L., (2004). Assessment and management of seafood safety and quality Assessment and management of seafood safety and quality, Food and Aquaculture Organization of the United Nations.

Kaplinsky, R., (2000), Globalization and Un-equalization: What can be learned from value chain analysis, Journal of development studies, Vol.37, No.2, 117-146

Khoi, L.N.D., (2007), Description of Pangasius value chain in Vietnam, CAS Discussion paper No 56, Centre for International Management and Development Antwerp

Khoi, L.N.D., (2007), Report of multi-case study of Pangasius small-scale farming practices, unpublished report

Luning, P. A., Marcelis, W. J., (2007), A conceptual model of food quality management functions based on a techno-managerial approach. Trends in food science & technology 18: p159-166.

Ministry of Fisheries and The World Bank, (2005), Fisheries and Aquaculture Sector Study. Vietnam.

Ministry of Fisheries and The World Bank, (2006), Guidelines for Environmental Management of Aquaculture Investments in Vietnam, EASRD.

Noori, H., Radford, R. (1995), Production operations: total quality and responsiveness. London: MCGrawhill.

Ruben, R., Tilburg, A., Trienekens, J. And Boekel, M., (2007), Linking market integration, supply chain governance, quality and value added in tropical food chains, Tropical food chains. Governance regimes for quality management. Wageningen Academic publishers

Tung N.T., Thanh N.V., Phillips M., (2004), Policy Research – Implications of Liberalization of Fish Trade for Developing Countries: A Case Study of Vietnam, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.

Verkerk, R., Linnermann, A., Boekel, M., (2007), Quality Analysis Critical Control Points in comsumer-oiented agro chains; an ecomomic organisation perspective. Tropical food chains. Governance regimes for quality management. Wageningen Academic publishers

Yin, R.K., (2003), Case study research: Design and methods, 3rd edition, Sage publications, Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

How to Cite
Nguyen Doan, K. (2019). Analysis of Organic Pangasius value chain in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. European Journal of Business and Management Research, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.24018/ejbmr.2019.4.3.49