Article Main Content

This study sought to establish Normative action influence on performance of biosocial projects in informal settlements in Nairobi County, Kenya. The objective of this study was to examine the extent to which normative action influence performance of biosocial projects in informal settlements. The variable indicators were: Social influence, Cultural beliefs, Psychological Factors and Social Empowerment. The study was premised on social cognitive theory. This study adopted pragmatism and mixed research approach to examine the normative action influence on performance of biosocial projects while descriptive and correlational research designs were adopted. Quantitative data was collected through structured self-administered questionnaires while qualitative data was collected through interview guides after the research instruments were pilot tested for validity through content related method and reliability through test-retest criterion. A sample size of 183 individuals from 61 biosocial projects were selected from a target sample of 70 biosocial projects in Nairobi County through Gakuu, Kidombo and Keiyoro, 2016 sampling formula (s= (z/e)2). Quantitative data was computed from structured questionnaires administered to 61 staff members working in the selected biosocial projects and 61 beneficiaries of the biosocial projects besides qualitative in- depth interviews with 61 state and non-state actors through purposive sampling technique. The statistical tools of analysis that were used for descriptive data were the arithmetic mean and the standard deviation while the statistical tools of analysis that were used for inferential statistics were Pearson’s Product Moment Correlation (r) and Stepwise Regression (R2). F-tests were used to test hypotheses in the study. Tests of statistical assumptions were carried out before data analysis to avoid invalidation of statistical analysis. From the data analysis the null hypothesis that stated there is no significance relationship between normative action and performance of biosocial projects in informal settlements in Nairobi County was rejected with r = 0.586, F= 40.454 at p = 0.000<0.01 and concluded that there is significant relationship between normative action and performance of biosocial projects in informal settlements. In conclusion, there were noted key legislations supporting biosocial projects and biosocial community among them being constitution of Kenya 2010 that prohibits discrimination, The Persons with Disabilities Act, 2003, the act being an all-inclusive law encompassing rehabilitation rights and equal opportunities for people with disabilities. It creates the National Council of Persons with Disabilities as a statutory organ to oversee the welfare of persons with disabilities. The Law also obliges that both public and private sector employer’s reserve five percent of jobs for disabled persons. Conversely, there is correspondingly the National Security Act, chapter 258, Laws of Kenya, the law alludes to the benefit for worker incapacitated before the established retirement age and National Social Security Fund Act, 1965 (sessional paper number 5 of 1997), amended in 2001, the subject contains a provision which states that mental and physical disabilities shall not be considered as leading to work incapacity.

References

  1. Aronson, E., WilsonT.D. & Akert A.M. (2005).
     Google Scholar
  2. Baron, R.M. and Kenny, D.A. (1999). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychology research: conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51, 1173 – 1182
     Google Scholar
  3. Cialdini RB, Kallgren CA, Reno RR (2012) A focus theory of normative conduct: A Theoretical refinement and re-evaluation of the role of norms in human behavior. Adv Exp Soc. Psychol 1991, 24:201-234.
     Google Scholar
  4. Crandall CS, Eshleman A, O’Brien L. (2002): Social norms and the expression and suppression of prejudice: the struggle for internalization. J Pers Soc Psychol 2002, 82:359-378.
     Google Scholar
  5. Crandall CS, Ferguson MA, Bahns AJ (2013): When we see prejudice: the normative Window and social change. In Stereotyping and Prejudice: Frontiers of Social Psychology. Edited by Stangor C, Crandall CS. Psychology Press; 2013:53-69.
     Google Scholar
  6. Duvendack, M, et al; 2011, ‘What is the evidence of the impact of microfinance on the well-being of poor people?’ EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London.
     Google Scholar
  7. Frauke Kreuter, Stanley Presser, and Roger Tourangeau. (2008). Social Desirability Bias in CATI, IVR, and Web Surveys: The Effects of Mode and Question Sensitivity. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72(5): 847-865
     Google Scholar
  8. Gakuu, Kidombo and Keiyoro (2016). Fundamentals of Research methods: Concepts, Practiv and Application. Kenya Aura Publishers.
     Google Scholar
  9. Gupta, M. C., & Boyd, L. H. (2008). Theory of constraints: a theory for operations management. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 28(10), 991–1012.
     Google Scholar
  10. Halperin, E., & Gross, J. (2011). Emotion regulation in violent conflict: Reappraisal, hope, and support for humanitarian aid to the opponent in wartime. Cognition & Emotion, 25, 1228–1236.
     Google Scholar
  11. Government of Kenya, (2012). Press release. Government printer.
     Google Scholar
  12. Kenya National Survey for Persons with Disabilities (2008). Preliminary report available at www.afri-can.org.
     Google Scholar
  13. Kenya National Disability survey 2008 report.
     Google Scholar
  14. Kidombo, Gakuu and Keiyoro (2013). Fundamentals of Management: Theories, concepts and Practices. Kenya Aura Publishers.
     Google Scholar
  15. Leach, L. P. (2012). Critical Chain Project Management Improves Project Performance. Project Management Journal, 30(002), 39.
     Google Scholar
  16. Leeman J, Baernholdt M, Sandelowski M. Developing a theory-based taxonomy of methods for implementing change in practice. J Adv Nurs.2007; 58:191–200.
     Google Scholar
  17. Moriya, N. (2008). Noise-Related Multivariate Optimal Joint-Analysis in Longitudinal Stochastic Processes in Progress in applied mathematical modeling". In Fengshan Yang. Progress in 224 Applied Mathematical Modeling. Nova Science Publishers, Inc. pp. 223–260. ISBN 978-1-60021-976-4.
     Google Scholar
  18. Nairobi County Integrated Development plan, NCIDP 2013-2014
     Google Scholar
  19. Nairobi Cross-sectional Slums Survey (NCSS) 2012, Population and Health Dynamics in Nairobi’s Informal Settlements, Nairobi, Kenya.
     Google Scholar
  20. Nyonje, Kyalo and Mulwa (2012). Monitoring and Evaluation of Development projects and programmes. Kenya Aura Publishers.
     Google Scholar
  21. Orlikowski W. Improvising organizational transformation over time: a situated change Perspective. Inform Syst Res. 1994; 7:63–92.
     Google Scholar
  22. Pittman, P. H. (1994). Project management: A more effective methodology for the planning and control of projects. Unpublished PhD Dissertation. Athens, GA: University of Georgia at Athens.
     Google Scholar
  23. Republic of Kenya (2010). Constitution of Kenya 2010.
     Google Scholar
  24. Republic of Kenya (2008). Planning bulletin article on disability mainstreaming in policy and planning by the Ministry of State for Planning, National development and Vision 2030.
     Google Scholar
  25. Saunders M., Lewis P., Thornhill A. (2003). Research Methods for Business Students. Prentice Hall Publishers 3rd Edition.
     Google Scholar
  26. Shapiro, S. S.; Wilk, M. B. (1965). An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Bimetrika 52 (3-4): 591–611.
     Google Scholar
  27. Shield, Patricia and Rangarjan, N. (2013). A Playbook for Research Methods: Integrating Conceptual Frameworks and Project Management. Stillwater, OK: New Forums Press.
     Google Scholar
  28. Wallerstein. (1992). Powerlessness, empowerment and Implications for promotion projects. American journal of promotion, 6:197-205
     Google Scholar
  29. World Bank. 2003. Adolescents and Youth with Disability: Issues and Challenges. International Policy and Program Review with Recommendations. Washington, DC: World Bank. Accessed March 2014. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/EXTLACREGTOPHIVAIDS/Resources/Adolescents and Disability Final.pdf WHO/World Bank. 2011. World Report on Disability. Geneva: WHO. Accessed March 9, 2014. http://www.who.int/disabilities/world_report/2011/en/.
     Google Scholar
  30. Van Zomeren, M., Spears, R., Fischer, A. H., & Leach, C. W. (2004). Put your money where your mouth is! Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 649–664. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.649.
     Google Scholar