##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

This research study investigates the relationship between sustainable project management (SPM) and benefits management (BM) on Project success (PS) with the influencing force of project governance (PG). The data was collected from the 207 employees and executive’s authorities of construction companies working in Pakistan. The convenience sampling was used for data collection. The results of the study show that SPM and BM has significant effect on PS. While the project governance (PG) is significantly influence the relationship. Moreover, another imperative discovery was made that the indirect combine effect of SPM and BM on PS is also significantly increased the project success rate.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Joselin, R., & Müller, R. (2015). Relationships between a project management methodology and Project success in different project governance contexts. International journal of project management, 33(6), 1377-1392.
     Google Scholar
  2. Yap, J. B. H., Chow, I. N., & Shavarebi, K. (2019). Criticality of construction industry problems In developing countries: Analyzing Malaysian projects. Journal of Management in Engineering, 35(5), 04019020.
     Google Scholar
  3. Larsson, J., & Larsson, L. (2020). Integration, application and importance of collaboration in Sustainable project management. Sustainability, 12(2), 585.
     Google Scholar
  4. Cooke-Davies, T. (2002). The “real” success factors on projects. International journal of project Management, 20(3), 185-190.
     Google Scholar
  5. Müller, R., & Turner, R. (2007). The influence of project managers on project success criteria and project success by type of project. European management journal, 25(4), 298-309.
     Google Scholar
  6. Martinsuo, M. (2013). Project portfolio management in practice and in context. International Journal of project management, 31(6), 794-803.
     Google Scholar
  7. Martinsuo, M., & Hoverfält, P. (2018). Change program management: Toward a capability for Managing value-oriented, integrated multi-project change in its context. International Journal of Project Management, 36(1), 134-146.
     Google Scholar
  8. Sirisomboonsuk, P., Gu, V. C., Cao, R. Q., & Burns, J. R. (2018). Relationships between projects Governance and information technology governance and their impact on project performance. International journal of project management, 36(2), 287-300.
     Google Scholar
  9. Zwikael, O., Chih, Y. Y., & Meredith, J. R. (2018). Project benefit management: Setting Effective target benefits. International Journal of Project Management, 36(4), 650–658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.01.02.
     Google Scholar
  10. Joslin, R., & Müller, R. (2015). Relationships between a project management methodology and Project success in different project governance contexts. International Journal of Project Management, 33(6), 13771392https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.03.005.
     Google Scholar
  11. Joslin, R., & Müller, R. (2016). The relationship between project governance and project Success. International Journal of Project Management, 34(4),613–626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.01.008.
     Google Scholar
  12. Radujković, M., & Sjekavica, M. (2017). Project management success factors. Procardia Engineering, 196, 607-615.
     Google Scholar
  13. Kisacik, B., Pamuk, O. N., Onat, A. M., Erer, S. B., Hatemi, G., Ozguler, Y., ... & Direskeneli, H. (2016). Characteristics predicting tuberculosis risk under tumor Necrosis factor-α inhibitors: report from a large multicenter cohort with high Background prevalence. The Journal of rheumatology, 43(3), 524-529.
     Google Scholar
  14. Alias, Z., Zawawi, E. M. A., Yusof, K., & Aris, N. M. (2014). Determining critical success Factors of project management practice: A conceptual framework. Procardia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 153, 61-69.
     Google Scholar
  15. Radujković, M., & Sjekavica, M. (2017). Project management success factors. Procardia Engineering, 196, 607-615.
     Google Scholar
  16. Varajão, J. (2016). Success Management as a PM knowledge area–work-in-progress. Procardia Computer Science, 100, 1095-1102.
     Google Scholar
  17. Mir, F. A., & Pinnington, A. H. (2014). Exploring the value of project management: linking Project management performance and project success. International Journal of project management, 32(2), 202-217.
     Google Scholar
  18. Serra, C. E. M., & Kunc, M. (2015). Benefits realization management and its influence on Project success and on the execution of business strategies. International Journal Of Project Management, 33(1), 53-66.
     Google Scholar
  19. Treanor, J. J., Talbot, H. K., Ohmit, S. E., Coleman, L. A., Thompson, M. G., Cheng, P. Y & Berman, L. (2012). Effectiveness of seasonal influenza vaccines in the United States during a season with circulation of all three vaccine strains. Clinical infectious diseases, 55(7), 951-959.
     Google Scholar
  20. Serra, C. E. M., & Kunc, M. (2012). Benefits Realization Management and its influence on Project success, project governance, and execution of business strategy-Analysis Of Brazil, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America. University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
     Google Scholar
  21. Banerjee, S., Humphrey-Jenner, M., & Nanda, V. (2015). Restraining overconfident CEOs Through improved governance: Evidence from the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. The Review of Financial Studies, 28(10), 2812-2858.
     Google Scholar
  22. Cooke-Davies, T. (2002). The “real” success factors on projects. International journal of project Management, 20(3), 185-190.
     Google Scholar
  23. Balchev, D., Kiprov, Y., Koychev, I., & Nakov, P. (2016, June). PMI-cool at SemEval-2016Task3: Experiments with PMI and goodness polarity lexicons for community question Answering. In Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval-2016) (pp. 844-850).
     Google Scholar
  24. Chih, Y. Y., & Zwikael, O. (2015). Project benefit management: A conceptual framework of Target benefit formulation. International Journal of Project Management, 33(2), 352-362.
     Google Scholar
  25. Breese, R., Jenner, S., Serra, C. E. M., & Thorp, J. (2015). Benefits management: Lost or found In translation. International Journal of Project Management, 33(7), 1438-1451.
     Google Scholar
  26. Breese, R., Jenner, S., Serra, C. E. M., & Thorp, J. (2015). Benefits management: Lost or found In translation. International Journal of Project Management, 33(7), 1438-1451.
     Google Scholar
  27. Müller, R., Zhai, L., & Wang, A. (2017). Governance and govern mentality in projects: Profiles and relationships with success. International Journal of Project Management, 35(3), 378-392.
     Google Scholar
  28. Turner, J. R., & Keegan, A. (2001). Mechanisms of governance in the project based Organization: Roles of the broker and steward. European management journal, 19(3), 254-267.
     Google Scholar
  29. Lechler, T. G., & Dvir, D. (2010). An alternative taxonomy of project management Structures: linking project management structures and project success. IEEE Transactions on engineering management, 57(2), 198-210.
     Google Scholar
  30. Lechler, T. G., & Dvir, D. (2010). An alternative taxonomy of project management structures: Linking project management structures and project success. IEEE Transactions on engineering management, 57(2), 198-210.
     Google Scholar
  31. Biesenthal, C., & Wilden, R. (2014). Multi-level project governance: Trends and Opportunities. International Journal of Project Management, 32(8), 1291-1308.
     Google Scholar
  32. Ul Musawir, A., Serra, C. E. M., Zwikael, O., & Ali, I. (2017). Project governance, benefit Management, and project success: Towards a framework for supporting organizational strategy implementation. International Journal of Project Management, 35(8),
     Google Scholar
  33. Mitnick, B. M. (2019). Origin of the theory of agency: an account by one of the theory's originators. Available at SSRN 1020378.1658-1672.
     Google Scholar
  34. Lundin, R. A., Tryggestad, K., Müller, R., & Martinsuo, M. (2015). The impact of relational Norms on information technology project success and its moderation through Project governance. International Journal ofManaging Projects in Business.
     Google Scholar
  35. Bekker, M. C., & Steyn, H. (2008, July). The impact of project governance principles on project Performance. In PICMET'08-2008 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology (pp. 1324-1330). IEEE.
     Google Scholar
  36. Elkington, J. (1998). Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st‐Century business. Environmental quality management, 8(1), 37-51.
     Google Scholar
  37. United Nations. (2014). Prototype global sustainable development report.
     Google Scholar
  38. Kivilä, J., Martinsuo, M., & Vuorinen, L. (2017). Sustainable project management Through project control in infrastructureprojects. International Journal ofProject Management, 35(6), 1167-1183.
     Google Scholar
  39. Amiril, A., Nawawi, A. H., Takim, R., & Latif, S. N. F. A. (2014). Transportation infrastructure Project sustainability factors and performance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 153, 90-98.
     Google Scholar
  40. Fernández-Sánchez, G., & Rodríguez-López, F. (2010). A methodology to identify sustainability Indicators in construction project management—Application to infrastructure Projects in Spain. Ecological Indicators, 10(6), 1193-1201.
     Google Scholar
  41. Kivilä, J., Martinsuo, M., & Vuorinen, L. (2017). Sustainable project management through Project control in infrastructure projects. International Journal of Project Management, 35(6), 1167-1183.
     Google Scholar
  42. Silvius, A. G., & Schipper, R. (2016). Exploring the relationship between sustainability and Project success-conceptual model and expected relationships. SciKA-Association for Promotion and Dissemination of Scientific Knowledge, 4(3), 5-22.
     Google Scholar
  43. PMI, A. (2013). Guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guide). In Project Management Institute (Vol. 5).
     Google Scholar
  44. Martens, M. L., & Carvalho, M. M. (2016). The challenge of introducing sustainability into
     Google Scholar
  45. Project management function: multiple-case studies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 117, 29-40.
     Google Scholar
  46. Carlsson, G. E., Möller, A., Blomstrand, C., Ueda, T., Mizushige, K., Yukiiri, K., & Yang, C.C. (2003). European stroke initiative recommendations for stroke management–
     Google Scholar
  47. Update 2003. Cerebrovascular Diseases, 16(4), 311-337.
     Google Scholar
  48. Gido, J., Clements, J., & Clements, J. (2014). Successful project management. Nelson Education Technical University, Department of Business
     Google Scholar
  49. Breese, R. (2012). Benefits realization management: Panacea or false Dawn? International Journal of Project Management, 30(3), 341-351.
     Google Scholar
  50. Chih, Y. Y., & Zwikael, O. (2015). Project benefit management: A conceptual framework of Target benefit formulation. International Journal of Project Management, 33(2), 352-362.
     Google Scholar
  51. Cserháti, G., & Szabó, L. (2014). The relationship between success criteria and success factors in Organizational event projects. International journal of project management, 32(4), 613-624.
     Google Scholar
  52. Kylindri, S., Blanas, G., Henriksen, L., & Stoyan, T. (2012, May). Measuring project outcomes: A review of success effectiveness variables. In Proceedings of 7th Annual MIBIS International Conference (pp. 212-223).
     Google Scholar
  53. Almajed, A. (2017). Information Technology Project Success in Saudi Arabian Public Organizations: Chief Information Officers’ Perceptions (Doctoral dissertation, University Of East Anglia).
     Google Scholar
  54. Atkinson, R. (1999). Project management: cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a Phenomenon, it’s time to accept other success criteria. International journal of project management, 17(6), 337-342.
     Google Scholar
  55. Biesenthal, C., & Wilden, R. (2014). Multi- level project governance: Trends and Opportunities. International Journal of Project Management, 32(8), 1291-1308.
     Google Scholar
  56. Bowen, P. L., Cheung, M. Y. D., & Rohde, F. H. (2007). Enhancing IT governance practices: A Model and case study of an organization's efforts. International Journal of Accounting information Systems, 8(3), 191-221.
     Google Scholar
  57. Too, E. G., & Weaver, P. (2014). The management of project management: A conceptual Framework for project governance. International Journal of Project Management, 32(8), 1382-1394.
     Google Scholar
  58. Meskendahl, S., Jonas, D., Kock, A., & Gemünden, H. G. (2013). A Boa Gestão de Portfolios deProjetos Compensa-Um Estudo Empírico (No. 76150). Darmstadt.
     Google Scholar
  59. ITGI, I. (2003). Board Briefing on IT Governance, (ed.). United States of America.
     Google Scholar
  60. Silvius, G. (2017). Sustainability as a new school of thought in project management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 166, 1479-1493.
     Google Scholar
  61. Carvalho, M. M., & Rabechini Jr, R. (2017). Can project sustainability management impact Project success? An empirical study applying a contingent.
     Google Scholar
  62. Martens, M. L., Kniess, C. T., Martens, C. D.P., & Carvalho, M. M. (2016). A study of Sustainable innovation in a product development project/Um estudo de inovacao sustentavelem projeto de desenvolvimento de produtos. Revista Exacta, 14(3), 477-495.
     Google Scholar
  63. Silvius, A. G., & Schipper, R. (2015). A conceptual model for exploring the relationship between Sustainability and project success. Procardia Computer Science, 64, 334-3.
     Google Scholar