Confidence in the Inter-organizational Cooperation of Social and Solidarity Economy Organizations
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Today, we are witnessing a growing enthusiasm for inter-organizational cooperation, as it has become the best path for managing organizations. Several authors and practitioners consider confidence as essential for the development and sustainability of this cooperation. According to Gambetta (1988) [1], confidence promotes cooperative behavior and promotes relationships between cooperants. For Social and Solidarity Economy organizations, inter-organizational cooperation is an excellent way to demonstrate the proper use of the principles of confidence. This is a key factor in their success, which is reflected in the practice of their daily activities. Thus, drawing inspiration from the literature dealing with confidence, and according to the measurement criteria proposed by Mayer & al., (1995) [2], we are conducting a quantitative study with three Economic Interest Groups (EIG) and four unions, composed of 59 cooperatives operating in d'Argane, located in Souss-Massa region. The goal is to show how confidence is built within these organizations. To what extent it influences inter-organizational cooperation.
Downloads
References
-
Gambetta D., (1988), “Confidence: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations”, Oxford, Blackwell.
Google Scholar
1
-
Mayer al., (1995), “An integrative model of organizational confidence”, Academy of Management Review, 20, 709 –734.
Google Scholar
2
-
Baudry, B. (2005). The economics of business-to-business relationships. Collection: Landmarks, Pages: 128, Publisher: Discovery.
Google Scholar
3
-
Forgues B., Fréchet M., Josserand E., (2006),"Inter-organizational relations: Conceptualization, results and avenues of research",French management review2006/5 (no 164), pages 17 to 31.
Google Scholar
4
-
Yami S., Le Roy F., (2007), “Collective strategies: a new form of competition”, EMS, Caen, 2007.
Google Scholar
5
-
Axelrod, R. (1984). The Evolution of Cooperation. Vol. 10, No. 2 (Apr. 1985), pp. 368-371. Published by: Academy of Management DOI: 10.2307 / 257983 https://www.jstor.org/stable/257983.
Google Scholar
6
-
Barnard, C.I. (1938). The functions of the executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar
7
-
Anderson, E., & Weitz, B. (1992). The use of pledges to build and sustain commitment in distribution channels. Journal of Marketing Research, vol. 29 (2), pp. 18-34.
Google Scholar
8
-
Ganesan S., (1994), "Determinates of long-term orientation in buyer-seller relationship", Journal of Marketing, vol.58 n.2 April, pp.1-19.
Google Scholar
9
-
Morgan RM, Hunt SD, (1994), “The commitment-confidence theory of relationship marketing” Journal of Marketing, 58 (3), 20-38.
Google Scholar
10
-
Doz YL, Hamel G., (1998), "Alliance Advantage", Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Google Scholar
11
-
Doney PM, Cannon JP, (1997), “An examination of the nature of confidence in buyer-seller relationships”, Journal of Marketing, 61 (2), 35-51.
Google Scholar
12
-
Dwyer al., (1987), “Developing buyer-seller relationship”. Journal of Marketing, 51 (2), 11-27.
Google Scholar
13
-
Moorman C., Deshpande R., Zaltman G., (1992), “Factors Affecting Confidence in Market”, Research Relationships, Journal of Marketing, 57 (January / 93), 81-101.
Google Scholar
14
-
Andrew, H., & Van de Ven, (2004). The Appeal and Difficulties of Confidence. Midwest Academy of Management Conference Luncheon Speech Minneapolis, MN, April 30, 2004.
Google Scholar
15
-
Richez-Battesti N., Malo M., (2012), “ESS and organizational changes”. International Social Economy Review, (325), 36–47.https://doi.org/10.7202/1017420ar.
Google Scholar
16
-
Taratynava N., (2009), “Game theory modeling of forecast exchanges in a network of companies”. National School of Mines of Saint-Etienne, 2009. French. NNT: 2009EMSE0034.
Google Scholar
17
-
Terssac GD, Maggi B., (1996), “Autonomy and design”, Cooperation and Design under the supervision of G. de Terssac and E. Friedberg, Octares Editions, p. 243-266, 1996.
Google Scholar
18
-
Erschler J., (1996). “Constraint approach for decision support and cooperation: a new logic for using formal models”, Cooperation and Design under the direction of G. de Terssac and E. Friedberg, Octares Editions, p. 137-147, 1996.
Google Scholar
19
-
Boujut, & al. (2002). Instrumentation of cooperation. Cooperation and knowledge in industrial systems under the supervision of R. Soënen and J. Perrin, Lavoisier, Hermes Science, p. 91-109, 2002.
Google Scholar
20
-
Campagne JP, Sénéchal O., (2002),“New Cooperation Requirements”, Cooperation and Knowledge in Industrial Systems, edited by Soënen R. and Perrin J., Paris, Hermès, 2002.
Google Scholar
21
-
Le Dain M., Calvi R., Cheriti S., (2011), “Proposition of a tool to evaluate the customer's performance in collaborative product development with suppliers”. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing, Springer Verlag, 2011, 5 (2), pp. 73-83.
Google Scholar
22
-
Camalot JP, (2000),"Decision support and cooperation in time and resource management", Doctoral thesis in Industrial Systems.
Google Scholar
23
-
Barthélém, J., & Fulconis, F., & Mothe, C., (2001). Inter-organizational cooperation: a transversal theoretical approach. In MARTINET, AC.
Google Scholar
24
-
Kœnig G., (1990), “Strategic management-Vision, maneuvers and tactics”, Paris: Nathan.
Google Scholar
25
-
Kœnig G., (2004), “Strategic management: projects, interactions and context”, Paris: Dunod.
Google Scholar
26
-
Garette B., Dussauge, P., (1995), “Alliance strategies”. Organization editions.
Google Scholar
27
-
Richardson, G.B. (1972), « The Organization Of Industry », The Economic Journal, n°82, p.883-896.
Google Scholar
28
-
Jensen, M., Meckling, T.W. (1976). « Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency cost, and ownership structure » Journal of Financial Economic, 1976, pp. 305-360.
Google Scholar
29
-
Williamson, O.E. (1981), « Cost escalation and contracting », Center for the Study of Organization. Innovation, University of Pennsylvania, Discussion Paper n° 95, janvier 1981.
Google Scholar
30
-
Williamson, OE (1994), 'The Institutions of the Economy, translated from: The Economic institutions of Capitalism (1985)', InterEditions, Paris, 1994.
Google Scholar
31
-
Thorelli, B. (1986). “Networks: Between markets and hierarchies”, Strategic Management Journal, Volume 7, Issue 1, pages 37–51, January / February 1986.
Google Scholar
32
-
Jarillo, JC (1988). “On Strategic Networks”, Strategic Management Journal 9 (1): 31-41.
Google Scholar
33
-
Kreps, D. (1990), « Corporate Culture and Economic Theory », in J. E Alt et K. A Shepsle Eds, Perspective on Positive Political Economy, Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
34
-
Anderson JC, Narus, JA (1991). “A model of distributor firm and manufacturer firm working partnerships”, Journal of Marketing, 54 42-58.
Google Scholar
35
-
Everaere, C. (1993). “From costs to transaction investments. For a reversal of Williamson's theory”. Revue Française d'Economie, n ° VIII, 3, p.149-203.
Google Scholar
36
-
Hamel, G., & Prahalad, CK 1994.'Competing fore the future', Havard Business School Press. Boston.
Google Scholar
37
-
Mohr, J. & Spekman, R. (1994)."Characteristics of partnership success: Partnership attributes, communication ...". Strategic Management Journal; Feb 1994; 15, 2; ABI / INFORM Global. pg. 135
Google Scholar
38
-
Hatchuel, A. (1996), "Cooperation and collective conception: variety and crises of prescription relations", in Cooperation and conception, G. de Terssac & E. Friedberg (eds), Octares Editions, 330 p.
Google Scholar
39
-
Dussange, al. (2000),"Relational strategies and technological alliance strategy". RFG. Page 7.
Google Scholar
40
-
Barlatier, 2002. 'Exploration, exploitation and coherence of the firm: the contributions of the network' Conference Paper, June 2002. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/239928998.
Google Scholar
41
-
Amabile, S. & Gadille, M. (2006). “Inter-company cooperation, information system and organizational attention”. Revue Française de Gestion, Vol 32/164, 97-118.
Google Scholar
42
-
Larousse dictionary, 2018.
Google Scholar
43
-
Rousseau & al., (1998), “Not so different after all: a cross-discipline view of confidence”, Academy of management review.
Google Scholar
44
-
Bazerman, M.H. (2001). The study of 'real' decision-making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 14: 353–355. Doi: 10.1002 / bdm.382.
Google Scholar
45
-
Hackman R., (2003),"Learning more by crossing levels: Evidence from airplanes, hospitals, and orchestras”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 905–922.
Google Scholar
46
-
Huber, GP., (1990), “A theory of the effects of advanced information technologies on organizational design, intelligence, and decision making”, Fulk & Steinfield 1990.
Google Scholar
47
-
Osigweh CAB, (1989), “Casing the case approach in management development”, The Journal of Management Development, 8 (2), 41-57.
Google Scholar
48
-
Bachmann, R., & Zaheer, A. (2006). Handbook Of trust research. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781847202819.
Google Scholar
49
-
Fukuyama F., (1995), "Confidence the social virtues and the creation of prosperity", New York The Free Press 1995 p26.
Google Scholar
50
-
McEvily et al. (2003). “Trust as an Organizing Principle”. Organization Science / Vol. 14, No. 1, January – February 2003.
Google Scholar
51
-
Zucker LG (1986), "Production of Confidence: Institutional Sources of Economic Structure", Research in Organizational Beh.
Google Scholar
52
-
Antit, I. (2008). "Towards the constitution of optimal confidence: reconciling the economic and the social", 19th congress of the AGRH, Dakar Senegal.
Google Scholar
53
-
Sitkin, SB, Roth, NL (1993). “Explaning the limited effectiviness of legalistic remedies for trust / distrust”, Organization Science, vol. 4, n ° 3, pp. 367-393.
Google Scholar
54
-
Éloi, L. (2009). "Ecology and inequalities". OFCE review, 2009/2 n ° 109.
Google Scholar
55
-
Godé-Sanchez, C. (2002). "Economic analysis of trust», Thesis for the Doctorate of Economics of the University of Aix-Marseille III, December 16, 2002.
Google Scholar
56
-
Sheppard BH, Sherman DM, (1998), “The grammars of trust: A model and general implications”, Academy of Management Review, 23, (3): 422-437.
Google Scholar
57
-
Deutsch M., (1958), “Confidence and suspicion,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2,265–279.
Google Scholar
58
-
Johnson-George C., Swap W., (1982), “Measurement of specific interpersonal confidence: Construction and validation of a scale to assess confidence in a specific other”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 1306-1317.
Google Scholar
59
-
Gillespie NA, Mann L., (2004), “Transformational leadership and shared values: The building blocks of confidence”, Journal of Managerial Psychology. 19, 6.588-607.
Google Scholar
60
-
Gillespie NA, (2003), “Measuring confidence in working relationships: the behavioral confidence inventory”, the 2003 Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Seattle, Washington.
Google Scholar
61
-
Serva MA, Fuller MA, Mayer RC, (2005), “The reciprocal nature of confidence: A longitudinal study of interacting teams”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26: 625–648.
Google Scholar
62
-
Hall & al., (2004), “Leader reputation and accountability in organizations: implications for dysfunctional leader behavior”, Leadership Quaterly, 15, 515−536.
Google Scholar
63
-
Lewicki RJ, Bunker BB, (1995), “Confidence in relationships: a model of confidence development and decline”, in Bunker, BB & Rubin, JZ Conflict, Cooperation and Justice, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass.
Google Scholar
64
-
Williams M., (2001), “In whom we confidence: group membership as an affective context for confidence development”, Academy of Management Review, 26 (3), 377-396.
Google Scholar
65
-
McKnight al., (1998), “Initial confidence formation in new organizational relationships”, Academy of Management Review, 23 (3), 473−490.
Google Scholar
66
-
Boughanbouz, C. (2015). “The determining factors of inter-organizational confidence in innovation networks. The case of the Alsace Energivie competitiveness cluster”. Doctoral thesis in Management Sciences.
Google Scholar
67
-
Inkpen & Currall, (2004). “The Coevolution of Trust, Control, and Learning in Joint Ventures”. Organization Science Vol. 15, No. 5, September – October 2004, pp. 586–599.
Google Scholar
68
-
Ouchi, WG (1980). “Markets, Bureaucracies, and Clans”. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25 (1): 129–141.
Google Scholar
69
-
Assens, C. (2013). “Network management - Weaving social links for economic well-being” (1st edition). De Boeck.
Google Scholar
70
-
Fulconis, F. & Paché, G. (2008). “Strategic management of inter-organizational networks put to the test of opportunistic behavior: development of an analytical framework”. Direction and Management | "La Revue des Sciences de Gestion" 2008/2 n ° 230 | pages 35 to 43 ISSN 1160-7742.
Google Scholar
71
-
Margit Enke, 2006. “Markenwert und Markenidentität komplexer Handelsleistungen: Konzeption und Analyze am Beispiel der Betriebsformenmarke Warenhaus’’. German Edition.
Google Scholar
72
-
Pavlou PA, (2002), “Consumer Acceptance of Electronic Commerce - Integrating Trust and Risk with the Technology Acceptance Model”, International Journal of Electronic Commerce, Vol. 7, No. 2, 2002/03.
Google Scholar
73
-
Bergadaà & al. (1999). Confidence in the tripartite seller-client-business relationship. Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of the French Marketing Association, Strasbourg, 283-299.
Google Scholar
74
-
Smith, JB, Barclay, DW (1997). “The Effects of Organizational Differences and Trust on the Effectiveness of Selling Partner Relationships”, Journal of Marketing, vol.61, pp.3-21.
Google Scholar
75
-
Jarvenpaa SL, Leidner DE, (1998), “Communication and trust in global virtual teams”, Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 3 (4), 1–36.
Google Scholar
76
-
Kouzes JM, Posner BJ, (2002), “Leadership challenge”, (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Google Scholar
77
-
Schoorman & al., (2007), “An integrative model of” organizational confidence: past, present, and future”, Academy of Management Review, 32 (2): 344–354.
Google Scholar
78
-
Mc Allister DJ, (1995), "Affect and Cognition Based Confidence as Foundation for Interpersonnal
Google Scholar
79
-
Cooperation in Organizations”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol 38, 24 - 59.
Google Scholar
80
-
Jeffries FL, Reed R. (2000), “Confidence and Adaptation In Relational Contracting”, Academy of Management Review, vol. 25, n ° 4, p. 873-882.
Google Scholar
81
-
Mishra AK, (1996), “Organizational responses to crisis: The centrality of confidence”, in RM Kramer & TR Tyler (Eds.). Confidence in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research: 261-287. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
82
-
Giffin K., (1967), “The contribution of studies of source credibility to a theory of interpersonal confidence in the communication department”, Psychological Bulletin, 68: 104-120.
Google Scholar
83
-
Andaleeb, SS. (1992). “The Confidence Concept: Research Issues for Channel of Distribution”, Research in Marketing, Vol. 11, Jai Press Inc., pp. 1-34.
Google Scholar
84
-
Blomqvist, K., (2002). “Partnering in the Dynamic Environment: The Role of Confidence in Asymmetric Technology Partnership Formation”. Lappeenrantaensis, Acta Universitatis.
Google Scholar
85
-
Gurviez P & Korchia M., 2002, 'Proposal of an multidimensional measurement scale of brand confidence' research and application in marketing, 17,3, 41-59.
Google Scholar
86
-
Atuahene-Gima, K., & Haiyang, L. (2002). “When does confidence matter? Antecedents and contingent effects of supervisee confidence on performance in selling new products in China and the United States”. Journal of Marketing, Vol. 66, No. 3.81.
Google Scholar
87
-
Kouzes JM, Posner BJ, (2002), “Leadership challenge”, (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Google Scholar
88
-
Schoorman & al., (2007), “An integrative model of” organizational trust: past, present, and future”, Academy of Management Review, 32 (2): 344–354.
Google Scholar
89
-
Biswas, S., & Varma, A. (2007). “Psychological climate and individual performance in India: Test of a mediated model”. Employee Relations, 29, 664-676.
Google Scholar
90
-
Peillon S., (2001), “The management of inter-company cooperation: the case of groups of SMEs”, Thesis for the doctorate in economics, École nationale supérieure des mines de Saint-Étienne, Jean-Monnet University, October 3.
Google Scholar
91
-
Nooteboom, (1997), “Effects of Confidence and Governance on Relational Risk” Academy Management Journal, Vol. 40, No. 2, 1997, pp. 308-338.
Google Scholar
92
-
Brousseau, G. (1997). Theory of Didactical Situations in Mathematics. Kluwer academic publishers.
Google Scholar
93
-
Mahoui K., Ferfera, MY, (2013), "Analysis of the modes of inter-organizational coordination in the case of relations between companies and companies-public institutions", CREAD notebooks n 104-2013.
Google Scholar
94
-
Tremblay D., (2002),"Solidarity economy in the world of international and transnational relations: balancing confidence and misconfidence". New Social Practices, 15 (1), 25–39. https://doi.org/10.7202/008259ar.
Google Scholar
95
-
Bauman, (1999), "The human cost of globalization", Hatchet, 1999.
Google Scholar
96
-
Lewicki RJ, Bunker BB, (1996), “Developing and maintaining confidence in work relationships”, in Kramer, RM and Tyler, TR (Eds), Confidence in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 114-39.
Google Scholar
97
-
Williams M., (2001), "In whom we trust: group membership as an affective context for trust development », Academy of Management Review, 26 (3), 377-396.
Google Scholar
98
-
Zaheer, A., & al. (1998), ‘Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of inter-organizational and interpersonal trust on performance’, Organization Science, 9, 141–59.
Google Scholar
99
-
Khalifa AH, Kammoun M., (2013), “Interpersonal confidence and organizational confidence in the client-service provider relationship: the case of the client-bank relationship”, Revue des Sciences de Gestion, 2013 / 3-4 (N ° 261-262), pages 167 to 174.
Google Scholar
100
-
Breton, A., & Wintrobe, R. (1982). “The logic of bureaucratic conduct. An economic analysis of competition, exchange and efficiency in private and public organizations”, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1982.
Google Scholar
101
-
Berahmani, & al. (2016). “The Phoenicultural Economic Interest Groups of Tafilal and: contrasting collective capacities”. Alternatives Rurales (4), October 2016, pp.1-14.
Google Scholar
102
-
IFA. The Interprofessional Federation of the Argan Sector.
Google Scholar
103
-
Everaere, C. (1993). “From costs to transaction investments. For a reversal of Williamson's theory”. Revue Française d'Economie, n ° VIII, 3, p.149-203.
Google Scholar
104
-
Roussel, P. 1996. “Compensation, motivation and job satisfaction”. Paris: Economica Editions.
Google Scholar
105
-
Roehrich, G., (1994), «Hedonistic and social innovations: proposal for a measurement scale”, Recherche et Application en Marke-ting, Vol. 10, n ° 2, pp 19-42.
Google Scholar
106
-
Igalens J., Roussel P. (1988), «Research Methods in Human Resources Management”, Economica.
Google Scholar
107
-
Paugam, S. (2008), ‘The social connection’, Paris, PUF.
Google Scholar
108
-
Honneth, Axel (2008). The society of contempt: towards a new critical theory, Paris, La Découverte, coll. ‘Pocket books’.
Google Scholar
109
Most read articles by the same author(s)
-
Saïd Ahrouch,
Khadija Rhaddioui,
The Effect of Taxation on Dairy Processing Cooperatives in Morocco: A Qualitative Research , European Journal of Business and Management Research: Vol. 7 No. 5 (2022)